
Quadro P4000 (móvel)
Popular choices:

T1000 8GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro P4000 (móvel) is positioned at rank 149 and the T1000 8GB is on rank 94, so the T1000 8GB offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P4000 (móvel)
Performance Per Dollar T1000 8GB
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The T1000 8GB uses modern memory architecture. The T1000 8GB likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro P4000 (móvel) lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The T1000 8GB is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro P4000 (móvel).
| Insight | Quadro P4000 (móvel) | T1000 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro P4000 (móvel) offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $290 versus $380 for the T1000 8GB, it costs 24% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 28.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro P4000 (móvel) | T1000 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+28.1%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($290) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($380) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P4000 (móvel) and T1000 8GB

Quadro P4000 (móvel)
The Quadro P4000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1227 MHz to 1228 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,500 points. Launch price was $819.61.

T1000 8GB
The T1000 8GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 6 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1065 MHz to 1395 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,674 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P4000 (móvel) scores 7,500 and the T1000 8GB reaches 7,674 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P4000 (móvel) is built on Pascal while the T1000 8GB uses Turing, both on 16 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Quadro P4000 (móvel)) vs 896 (T1000 8GB). Raw compute: 4.398 TFLOPS (Quadro P4000 (móvel)) vs 2.5 TFLOPS (T1000 8GB). Boost clocks: 1228 MHz vs 1395 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P4000 (móvel) | T1000 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,500 | 7,674+2% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Turing |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792+100% | 896 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.398 TFLOPS+76% | 2.5 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1228 MHz | 1395 MHz+14% |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 112+100% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 672 KB | 896 KB+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P4000 (móvel) | T1000 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro P4000 (móvel)) vs 1 MB (T1000 8GB) — the Quadro P4000 (móvel) has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro P4000 (móvel) | T1000 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Quadro P4000 (móvel)) vs 12.1 (T1000 8GB). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro P4000 (móvel) | T1000 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (6th Gen) (Quadro P4000 (móvel)) vs NVENC 7.0 (T1000 8GB). Decoder: NVDEC (3rd Gen) vs PureVideo HD VP9. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (Quadro P4000 (móvel)) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (T1000 8GB).
| Feature | Quadro P4000 (móvel) | T1000 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (6th Gen) | NVENC 7.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (3rd Gen) | PureVideo HD VP9 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P4000 (móvel) draws 100W versus the T1000 8GB's 50W — a 66.7% difference. The T1000 8GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P4000 (móvel)) vs 350W (T1000 8GB). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 156mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 70°C.
| Feature | Quadro P4000 (móvel) | T1000 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 50W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 156mm |
| Height | 0mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | 70°C-7% |
| Perf/Watt | 75.0 | 153.5+105% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P4000 (móvel) launched at $819 MSRP and currently averages $290, while the T1000 8GB launched at $500 and now averages $380. The Quadro P4000 (móvel) costs 23.7% less ($90 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 25.9 (Quadro P4000 (móvel)) vs 20.2 (T1000 8GB) — the Quadro P4000 (móvel) offers 28.2% better value. The T1000 8GB is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2017).
| Feature | Quadro P4000 (móvel) | T1000 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $819 | $500-39% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $290-24% | $380 |
| Performance per Dollar | 25.9+28% | 20.2 |
| Codename | GP104 | TU117 |
| Release | January 11 2017 | May 6 2021 |
| Ranking | #326 | #332 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















