CPU
GPU
Quadro P4000 (móvel)
Popular choices:
Radeon RX 5300
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro P4000 (móvel) is positioned at rank #149 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P4000 (móvel)
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 5300
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX 5300 uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon RX 5300 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro P4000 (móvel) lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 5300 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro P4000 (móvel) offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro P4000 (móvel) | Radeon RX 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+33.3%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 5300 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $50 versus $290 for the Quadro P4000 (móvel), it costs 83% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 488.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro P4000 (móvel) | Radeon RX 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+488.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($290) | ✅More affordable ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P4000 (móvel) and Radeon RX 5300
Quadro P4000 (móvel)
The Quadro P4000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1227 MHz to 1228 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,500 points. Launch price was $819.61.
Radeon RX 5300
The Radeon RX 5300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 28 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1327 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,606 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P4000 (móvel) scores 7,500 and the Radeon RX 5300 reaches 7,606 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P4000 (móvel) is built on Pascal while the Radeon RX 5300 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 16 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Quadro P4000 (móvel)) vs 1,408 (Radeon RX 5300). Raw compute: 4.398 TFLOPS (Quadro P4000 (móvel)) vs 4.632 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5300). Boost clocks: 1228 MHz vs 1645 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P4000 (móvel) | Radeon RX 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,500 | 7,606+1% |
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792+27% | 1408 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.398 TFLOPS | 4.632 TFLOPS+5% |
| Boost Clock | 1228 MHz | 1645 MHz+34% |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 112+27% | 88 |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+33% | 1.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P4000 (móvel) | Radeon RX 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro P4000 (móvel) comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 5300 has 3 GB. The Quadro P4000 (móvel) offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 96-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro P4000 (móvel)) vs 1.5 MB (Radeon RX 5300) — the Quadro P4000 (móvel) has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro P4000 (móvel) | Radeon RX 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+33% | 3 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+167% | 96-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+33% | 1.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Quadro P4000 (móvel)) vs 12.1 (Radeon RX 5300). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro P4000 (móvel) | Radeon RX 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (6th Gen) (Quadro P4000 (móvel)) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5300). Decoder: NVDEC (3rd Gen) vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (Quadro P4000 (móvel)) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon RX 5300).
| Feature | Quadro P4000 (móvel) | Radeon RX 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (6th Gen) | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (3rd Gen) | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P4000 (móvel) draws 100W versus the Radeon RX 5300's 100W — a 0% difference. The Radeon RX 5300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P4000 (móvel)) vs 350W (Radeon RX 5300). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 180mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 75°C.
| Feature | Quadro P4000 (móvel) | Radeon RX 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 180mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 75.0 | 76.1+1% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P4000 (móvel) launched at $819 MSRP and currently averages $290, while the Radeon RX 5300 launched at $129 and now averages $50. The Radeon RX 5300 costs 82.8% less ($240 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 25.9 (Quadro P4000 (móvel)) vs 152.1 (Radeon RX 5300) — the Radeon RX 5300 offers 487.3% better value. The Radeon RX 5300 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2017).
| Feature | Quadro P4000 (móvel) | Radeon RX 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $819 | $129-84% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $290 | $50-83% |
| Performance per Dollar | 25.9 | 152.1+487% |
| Codename | GP104 | Navi 14 |
| Release | January 11 2017 | May 28 2020 |
| Ranking | #326 | #336 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro P4000 (móvel) and Radeon RX 5300
