Quadro P4000 (móvel)
Radeon RX 780
Quadro P4000 (móvel) vs Radeon RX 780 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro P4000 (móvel) vs Radeon RX 780 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro P4000 (móvel) vs Radeon RX 780: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro P4000 (móvel)
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 180W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 780 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌2017 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌64.1% HIGHER MSRP$819 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.2 vs 15.3 G3D/$ ($819 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
Radeon RX 780
2024Why buy it
- ✅44.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $320 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $819 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 67.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.3 vs 9.2 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $819 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌80% higher power demand at 180W vs 100W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro P4000 (móvel) vs Radeon RX 780 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Quadro P4000 (móvel)
The Quadro P4000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1227 MHz to 1228 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,500 points. Launch price was $819.61.
Radeon RX 780
The Radeon RX 780 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 11 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2335 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,658 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P4000 (móvel) scores 7,500 and the Radeon RX 780 reaches 7,658 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P4000 (móvel) is built on Pascal while the Radeon RX 780 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 16 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Quadro P4000 (móvel)) vs 3,840 (Radeon RX 780). Raw compute: 4.398 TFLOPS (Quadro P4000 (móvel)) vs 35.87 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 780). Boost clocks: 1228 MHz vs 2335 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P4000 (móvel) | Radeon RX 780 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,500 | 7,658+2% |
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792 | 3840+114% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.398 TFLOPS | 35.87 TFLOPS+716% |
| Boost Clock | 1228 MHz | 2335 MHz+90% |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 112 | 240+114% |
| L1 Cache | 672 KB | 768 KB+14% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 780 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Quadro P4000 (móvel) does not have comparable native support in the same tier.
| Feature | Quadro P4000 (móvel) | Radeon RX 780 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro P4000 (móvel) and System on the Radeon RX 780. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro P4000 (móvel)) vs 4 MB (Radeon RX 780) — the Radeon RX 780 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro P4000 (móvel) | Radeon RX 780 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Quadro P4000 (móvel)) vs 12 (12_2) (Radeon RX 780). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro P4000 (móvel) | Radeon RX 780 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (6th Gen) (Quadro P4000 (móvel)) vs RDNA 3 Dual Media Engine (Radeon RX 780). Decoder: NVDEC (3rd Gen) vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (Quadro P4000 (móvel)) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 780).
| Feature | Quadro P4000 (móvel) | Radeon RX 780 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (6th Gen) | RDNA 3 Dual Media Engine |
| Decoder | NVDEC (3rd Gen) | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9 | H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P4000 (móvel) draws 100W versus the Radeon RX 780's 180W — a 57.1% difference. The Quadro P4000 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P4000 (móvel)) vs 350W (Radeon RX 780). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 85°C.
| Feature | Quadro P4000 (móvel) | Radeon RX 780 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-44% | 180W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 75-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 75.0+76% | 42.5 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Quadro P4000 (móvel) came in at $819, while the Radeon RX 780 launched at $499. On MSRP, Radeon RX 780 was 39.1% cheaper ($320 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.2 (Quadro P4000 (móvel)) vs 15.3 (Radeon RX 780) — the Radeon RX 780 offers 66.3% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX 780 (2024 vs 2017).
| Feature | Quadro P4000 (móvel) | Radeon RX 780 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $819 | $499-39% |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.2 | 15.3+66% |
| Codename | GP104 | Navi 32 |
| Release | January 11 2017 | September 11 2024 |
| Ranking | #326 | #131 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro P4000 (móvel) and Radeon RX 780
