Quadro P600
VS
Radeon RX 560X

Quadro P600 vs Radeon RX 560X

NVIDIA

Quadro P600

2017Core: 1430 MHzBoost: 1620 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon RX 560X

2018Core: 1175 MHzBoost: 1275 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon RX 560X uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon RX 560X likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro P600 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon RX 560X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro P600.

InsightQuadro P600Radeon RX 560X
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%)
Leading raw performance (+0.7%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon RX 560X offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $40 versus $60 for the Quadro P600, it costs 33% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 51% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightQuadro P600Radeon RX 560X
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+51%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($60)
More affordable ($40)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P600 and Radeon RX 560X

NVIDIA

Quadro P600

The Quadro P600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 7 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1430 MHz to 1620 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,318 points. Launch price was $178.

AMD

Radeon RX 560X

The Radeon RX 560X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 11 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1175 MHz to 1275 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,340 points.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro P600 scores 3,318 and the Radeon RX 560X reaches 3,340 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P600 is built on Pascal while the Radeon RX 560X uses GCN 4.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Quadro P600) vs 1,024 (Radeon RX 560X). Raw compute: 1.244 TFLOPS (Quadro P600) vs 2.611 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 560X). Boost clocks: 1620 MHz vs 1275 MHz.

FeatureQuadro P600Radeon RX 560X
G3D Mark Score
3,318
3,340
Architecture
Pascal
GCN 4.0
Process Node
14 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
384
1024+167%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.244 TFLOPS
2.611 TFLOPS+110%
Boost Clock
1620 MHz+27%
1275 MHz
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
24
64+167%
L1 Cache
144 KB
256 KB+78%
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro P600Radeon RX 560X
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 2.1
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro P600 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 560X has 4 GB. The Radeon RX 560X offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit.

FeatureQuadro P600Radeon RX 560X
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
4 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
256-bit+300%
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro P600 draws 40W versus the Radeon RX 560X's 75W — a 60.9% difference. The Quadro P600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P600) vs 400W (Radeon RX 560X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.

FeatureQuadro P600Radeon RX 560X
TDP
40W-47%
75W
Recommended PSU
350W-13%
400W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
None
Length
145mm
Slots
1
Perf/Watt
83.0+87%
44.5
💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro P600 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $60, while the Radeon RX 560X launched at $129 and now averages $40. The Radeon RX 560X costs 33.3% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 55.3 (Quadro P600) vs 83.5 (Radeon RX 560X) — the Radeon RX 560X offers 51% better value. The Radeon RX 560X is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2017).

FeatureQuadro P600Radeon RX 560X
MSRP
$0-100%
$129
Avg Price (30d)
$60
$40-33%
Performance per Dollar
55.3
83.5+51%
Codename
GP107
Polaris 21
Release
February 7 2017
April 11 2018
Ranking
#558
#556