
Quadro P600 vs Radeon RX 560X

Quadro P600
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 560X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX 560X uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon RX 560X likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro P600 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 560X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro P600.
| Insight | Quadro P600 | Radeon RX 560X |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 560X offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $40 versus $60 for the Quadro P600, it costs 33% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 51% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro P600 | Radeon RX 560X |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+51%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($60) | ✅More affordable ($40) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P600 and Radeon RX 560X

Quadro P600
The Quadro P600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 7 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1430 MHz to 1620 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,318 points. Launch price was $178.

Radeon RX 560X
The Radeon RX 560X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 11 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1175 MHz to 1275 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,340 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P600 scores 3,318 and the Radeon RX 560X reaches 3,340 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P600 is built on Pascal while the Radeon RX 560X uses GCN 4.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Quadro P600) vs 1,024 (Radeon RX 560X). Raw compute: 1.244 TFLOPS (Quadro P600) vs 2.611 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 560X). Boost clocks: 1620 MHz vs 1275 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P600 | Radeon RX 560X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,318 | 3,340 |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 1024+167% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.244 TFLOPS | 2.611 TFLOPS+110% |
| Boost Clock | 1620 MHz+27% | 1275 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 24 | 64+167% |
| L1 Cache | 144 KB | 256 KB+78% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P600 | Radeon RX 560X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro P600 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 560X has 4 GB. The Radeon RX 560X offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | Quadro P600 | Radeon RX 560X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 256-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P600 draws 40W versus the Radeon RX 560X's 75W — a 60.9% difference. The Quadro P600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P600) vs 400W (Radeon RX 560X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.
| Feature | Quadro P600 | Radeon RX 560X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 40W-47% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-13% | 400W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 145mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 83.0+87% | 44.5 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P600 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $60, while the Radeon RX 560X launched at $129 and now averages $40. The Radeon RX 560X costs 33.3% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 55.3 (Quadro P600) vs 83.5 (Radeon RX 560X) — the Radeon RX 560X offers 51% better value. The Radeon RX 560X is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2017).
| Feature | Quadro P600 | Radeon RX 560X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $129 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $60 | $40-33% |
| Performance per Dollar | 55.3 | 83.5+51% |
| Codename | GP107 | Polaris 21 |
| Release | February 7 2017 | April 11 2018 |
| Ranking | #558 | #556 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















