
Quadro P600

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Quadro P600 vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro P600 vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
Quadro P600 vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro P600
2017Why buy it
- β Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- β2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 33.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- β33.3% higher power demand at 40W vs 30W.
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
2020Why buy it
- β Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 33.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- β Quadro P600 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is the less risky modern option long term.
- β Draws 30W instead of 40W, a 10W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βOlder hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro P600 vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro P600
The Quadro P600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 7 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1430 MHz to 1620 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,318 points. Launch price was $178.
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. It has 96 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,390 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P600 scores 3,318 and the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 reaches 3,390 in the G3D Mark benchmark β just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P600 is built on Pascal while the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 uses Gen. 11 Ice Lake, both on 14 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 384 (Quadro P600) vs 96 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7).
| Feature | Quadro P600 | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,318 | 3,390+2% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 10 nm |
| Shading Units | 384+300% | 96 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P600 | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro P600 and 64-bit on the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7.
| Feature | Quadro P600 | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (Quadro P600) vs 12.1 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro P600 | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12.1 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th Gen (Quadro P600) vs QuickSync (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7). Decoder: NVDEC 4th Gen vs QuickSync.
| Feature | Quadro P600 | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6th Gen | QuickSync |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th Gen | QuickSync |
| Codecs | β | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P600 draws 40W versus the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7's 30W β a 28.6% difference. The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P600) vs 350W (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 145mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Quadro P600 | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 40W | 30W-25% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 145mm | 0mm |
| Height | β | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | β | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 83.0 | 113.0+36% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Quadro P600 came in at $0, while the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 launched at $100. On MSRP, Quadro P600 was 100+% cheaper ($100 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Quadro P600) vs 33.9 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7) β the Quadro P600 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 (2020 vs 2017).
| Feature | Quadro P600 | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $100 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 33.9 |
| Codename | GP107 | Tiger Lake Xe |
| Release | February 7 2017 | August 15 2020 |
| Ranking | #558 | #508 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















