Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) vs RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) vs RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) vs RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)
2020Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ✅Draws 18W instead of 70W, a 52W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 16.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $849 MSRP).
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
2025Why buy it
- ✅52.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 16.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($849 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Blackwell 2.0 on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ❌288.9% higher power demand at 70W vs 18W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) vs RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)
The Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 2 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 18W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,832 points.
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 11 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 982 MHz to 1957 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,363 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) scores 14,832 and the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell reaches 14,363 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) is built on Turing while the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell uses Blackwell 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 896 (Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)) vs 4,352 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Raw compute: 3.037 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)) vs 17.03 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Boost clocks: 1695 MHz vs 1957 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,832+3% | 14,363 |
| Architecture | Turing | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 4352+386% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.037 TFLOPS | 17.03 TFLOPS+461% |
| Boost Clock | 1695 MHz | 1957 MHz+15% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 56 | 136+143% |
| L1 Cache | 0.88 MB | 4.3 MB+389% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 32 MB+3100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) is support for DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) supports the newer DLSS 4 Super Resolution, whereas the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 4 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 4) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 16 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) and 256-bit on the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)) vs 32 MB (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell) — the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 32 MB+3100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)) vs 12.0 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.4+17% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)) vs 9th Gen NVENC (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 6th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | 9th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | 6th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) draws 18W versus the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell's 70W — a 118.2% difference. The Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)) vs 500W (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 167mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 18W-74% | 70W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 167mm |
| Height | 0mm | 68mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 70°C-13% |
| Perf/Watt | 824.0+302% | 205.2 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell (2025 vs 2020).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $849 |
| Codename | TU117 | GB206 |
| Release | December 2 2020 | August 11 2025 |
| Ranking | #548 | #165 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) and RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
