
Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) vs RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell

Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)
Popular choices:

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)
Performance Per Dollar RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell.
| Insight | Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.3%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Turing (2018−2022) / 12nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Blackwell 2.0 / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) and RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell

Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)
The Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 2 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 18W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,832 points.

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 11 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 982 MHz to 1957 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,363 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) scores 14,832 and the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell reaches 14,363 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) is built on Turing while the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell uses Blackwell 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 896 (Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)) vs 4,352 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Raw compute: 3.037 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)) vs 17.03 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Boost clocks: 1695 MHz vs 1957 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,832+3% | 14,363 |
| Architecture | Turing | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 4352+386% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.037 TFLOPS | 17.03 TFLOPS+461% |
| Boost Clock | 1695 MHz | 1957 MHz+15% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 56 | 136+143% |
| L1 Cache | 0.88 MB | 4.3 MB+389% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 32 MB+3100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 16 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)) vs 32 MB (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell) — the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 32 MB+3100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)) vs 12.0 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.4+17% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)) vs 9th Gen NVENC (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 6th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | 9th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | 6th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) draws 18W versus the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell's 70W — a 118.2% difference. The Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)) vs 500W (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 167mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 18W-74% | 70W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 167mm |
| Height | 0mm | 68mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 70°C-13% |
| Perf/Watt | 824.0+302% | 205.2 |
Value Analysis
The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2020).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $849 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $748 |
| Codename | TU117 | GB206 |
| Release | December 2 2020 | August 11 2025 |
| Ranking | #548 | #165 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















