Quadro T1000 Max-Q vs Tesla K8

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro T1000 Max-Q vs Tesla K8 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro T1000 Max-Q vs Tesla K8: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro T1000 Max-Q

2019

Why buy it

✅Tesla K8 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Quadro T1000 Max-Q is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 50W instead of 100W, a 50W reduction.
✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).

Tesla K8

2014

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌100% higher power demand at 100W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Tesla K8 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.2% in PassMark G3D (5,111 vs 5,000), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro T1000 Max-Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 12nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2014. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Tesla K8 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Tesla K8 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro T1000 Max-Q has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro T1000 Max-Q vs Tesla K8 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro T1000 Max-Q

The Quadro T1000 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 765 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,000 points.

Tesla K8

The Tesla K8 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 16 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 693 MHz to 811 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,111 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro T1000 Max-Q scores 5,000 and the Tesla K8 reaches 5,111 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro T1000 Max-Q is built on Turing while the Tesla K8 uses Kepler, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 896 (Quadro T1000 Max-Q) vs 1,536 (Tesla K8). Raw compute: 2.419 TFLOPS (Quadro T1000 Max-Q) vs 2.491 TFLOPS (Tesla K8). Boost clocks: 1350 MHz vs 811 MHz.

Feature	Quadro T1000 Max-Q	Tesla K8
G3D Mark Score	5,000	5,111+2%
Architecture	Turing	Kepler
Process Node	12 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	896	1536+71%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.419 TFLOPS	2.491 TFLOPS+3%
Boost Clock	1350 MHz+66%	811 MHz
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	56	128+129%
L1 Cache	896 KB+600%	128 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro T1000 Max-Q	Tesla K8
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro T1000 Max-Q and 128-bit on the Tesla K8. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Quadro T1000 Max-Q) vs 0.5 MB (Tesla K8) — the Quadro T1000 Max-Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro T1000 Max-Q	Tesla K8
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro T1000 Max-Q draws 50W versus the Tesla K8's 100W — a 66.7% difference. The Quadro T1000 Max-Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro T1000 Max-Q) vs 350W (Tesla K8). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Quadro T1000 Max-Q	Tesla K8
TDP	50W-50%	100W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt	100.0+96%	51.1

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Quadro T1000 Max-Q (2019 vs 2014).

Feature	Quadro T1000 Max-Q	Tesla K8
MSRP	—	$1000
Codename	TU117	GK104
Release	May 27 2019	September 16 2014
Ranking	#364	#515

Search Quadro T1000 Max-Q on Amazon

Search Tesla K8 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.