Arc A370M vs Quadro T1000 Max-Q

Arc A370M vs Quadro T1000 Max-Q Performance Spectrum

Arc A370M

4 GB 35

5,115

+2.3%

5,000

0.0%

GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Arc A370M vs Quadro T1000 Max-Q FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Arc A370M vs Quadro T1000 Max-Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Arc A370M

2022

Why buy it

✅12.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Better long-term bet: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 35W instead of 50W, a 15W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Quadro T1000 Max-Q

2019

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Arc A370M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌42.9% higher power demand at 50W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Arc A370M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 12.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.3% in PassMark G3D (5,115 vs 5,000), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Arc A370M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 6nm process instead of 12nm, 8 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2019. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Arc A370M makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Arc A370M vs Quadro T1000 Max-Q Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Arc A370M

The Arc A370M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1550 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,115 points.

Quadro T1000 Max-Q

The Quadro T1000 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 765 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,000 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Arc A370M scores 5,115 and the Quadro T1000 Max-Q reaches 5,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A370M is built on Generation 12.7 while the Quadro T1000 Max-Q uses Turing, both on 6 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Arc A370M) vs 896 (Quadro T1000 Max-Q). Raw compute: 3.174 TFLOPS (Arc A370M) vs 2.419 TFLOPS (Quadro T1000 Max-Q). Boost clocks: 1550 MHz vs 1350 MHz.

Feature	Arc A370M	Quadro T1000 Max-Q
G3D Mark Score	5,115+2%	5,000
Architecture	Generation 12.7	Turing
Process Node	6 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	1024+14%	896
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.174 TFLOPS+31%	2.419 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1550 MHz+15%	1350 MHz
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	64+14%	56
L1 Cache	1.5 MB+70%	0.88 MB
L2 Cache	4 MB+300%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Arc A370M	Quadro T1000 Max-Q
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Arc A370M and 64-bit on the Quadro T1000 Max-Q. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Arc A370M) vs 1 MB (Quadro T1000 Max-Q) — the Arc A370M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Arc A370M	Quadro T1000 Max-Q
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB+300%	1 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc A370M draws 35W versus the Quadro T1000 Max-Q's 50W — a 35.3% difference. The Arc A370M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc A370M) vs 350W (Quadro T1000 Max-Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.