Quadro T2000 vs Quadro M5000M

CPU

GPU

Quadro T2000

2010Core: 625 MHz

Quadro M5000M

2015Core: 975 MHzBoost: 1051 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Quadro T2000

7,279

+3.2%

GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU

GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile

Quadro M5000M

100

7,056

0.0%

GeForce GTX 570

GeForce GTX 580

GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2

GeForce MX570 A

GeForce GTX 980

GeForce RTX 2080 (móvel)

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

GeForce RTX 5060 Ti

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro T2000 is positioned at rank 125 and the Quadro M5000M is on rank 13, so the Quadro M5000M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro T2000

#64

RTX 4000 Ada Generation

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1547

99%

#65

RTX A4000H

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $927

97%

#66

Radeon PRO W7800

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2200

90%

#67

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1450

85%

#110

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

1218%

#125

Quadro T2000

MSRP: $600|Avg: $75

100%

#130

FirePro D300

MSRP: $500|Avg: $20

94%

#131

Radeon Pro WX 3200

MSRP: $199|Avg: $199

92%

#132

Radeon Pro WX 5100

MSRP: $499|Avg: $120

91%

#134

Quadro P2000 (móvel)

MSRP: $500|Avg: $150

88%

#135

Quadro P3000 (móvel)

MSRP: $600|Avg: $200

88%

#136

Quadro P3000

MSRP: $600|Avg: $80

88%

#139

Quadro T1000 (móvel)

MSRP: $500|Avg: $120

82%

#140

Radeon Pro V520

MSRP: $800|Avg: $300

82%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro M5000M

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

209%

#13

Quadro M5000M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#26

RTX A400

MSRP: $135|Avg: $135

63%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro T2000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro M5000M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Quadro T2000	Quadro M5000M
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+3.2%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.2%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro T2000 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro T2000 Benchmark Check

Quadro M5000M Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

No prediction data available

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro T2000 and Quadro M5000M

Quadro T2000

The Quadro T2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 24 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 62W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,279 points. Launch price was $599.

Quadro M5000M

The Quadro M5000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 975 MHz to 1051 MHz. It has 1,536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,056 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro T2000 scores 7,279 and the Quadro M5000M reaches 7,056 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro T2000 is built on Fermi while the Quadro M5000M uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 192 (Quadro T2000) vs 1 (Quadro M5000M). Raw compute: 0.48 TFLOPS (Quadro T2000) vs 2.995 TFLOPS (Quadro M5000M).

Feature	Quadro T2000	Quadro M5000M
G3D Mark Score	7,279+3%	7,056
Architecture	Fermi	Maxwell 2.0
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	192	1,536+700%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.48 TFLOPS	2.995 TFLOPS+524%
ROPs	16	64+300%
TMUs	32	96+200%
L1 Cache	256 KB	576 KB+125%
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	2 MB+700%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro T2000	Quadro M5000M
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro T2000 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro M5000M has 8 GB. The Quadro M5000M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Quadro T2000) vs 2 MB (Quadro M5000M) — the Quadro M5000M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro T2000	Quadro M5000M
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	8 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit	256-bit
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	2 MB+700%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro T2000) vs 12.1 (Quadro M5000M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Quadro T2000	Quadro M5000M
DirectX	12.1	12.1
Vulkan	1.3	1.4+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 7.0 (Quadro T2000) vs NVENC 5.0 (Quadro M5000M). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP9 vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro T2000) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (Quadro M5000M).

Feature	Quadro T2000	Quadro M5000M
Encoder	NVENC 7.0	NVENC 5.0
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP9	PureVideo HD VP6
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro T2000 draws 62W versus the Quadro M5000M's 100W — a 46.9% difference. The Quadro T2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro T2000) vs 350W (Quadro M5000M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.