Quadro T2000 vs RadeonT 780M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro T2000 vs RadeonT 780M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro T2000 vs RadeonT 780M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro T2000

2010

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than RadeonT 780M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2010 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌313.3% higher power demand at 62W vs 15W.

RadeonT 780M

2024

Why buy it

✅173.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 15W instead of 62W, a 47W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 12.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $600 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

RadeonT 780M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 173.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro T2000 instead at 7,279 vs 7,098, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RadeonT 780M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 4nm process instead of 40nm, 12 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2024 generation instead of 2010. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro T2000 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro T2000 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, RadeonT 780M has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro T2000 vs RadeonT 780M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro T2000

The Quadro T2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 24 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 62W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,279 points. Launch price was $599.

RadeonT 780M

The RadeonT 780M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,098 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro T2000 scores 7,279 and the RadeonT 780M reaches 7,098 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro T2000 is built on Fermi while the RadeonT 780M uses RDNA 3.0, both on 40 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 192 (Quadro T2000) vs 768 (RadeonT 780M). Raw compute: 0.48 TFLOPS (Quadro T2000) vs 8.909 TFLOPS (RadeonT 780M).

Feature	Quadro T2000	RadeonT 780M
G3D Mark Score	7,279+3%	7,098
Architecture	Fermi	RDNA 3.0
Process Node	40 nm	4 nm
Shading Units	192	768+300%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.48 TFLOPS	8.909 TFLOPS+1756%
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	32	48+50%
L1 Cache	256 KB	256 KB
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	2 MB+700%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro T2000	RadeonT 780M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro T2000 and 128-bit on the RadeonT 780M. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Quadro T2000) vs 2 MB (RadeonT 780M) — the RadeonT 780M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro T2000	RadeonT 780M
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	2 MB+700%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro T2000) vs 12.2 (RadeonT 780M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Quadro T2000	RadeonT 780M
DirectX	12.1	12.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 7.0 (Quadro T2000) vs VCN 4.0 (RadeonT 780M). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP9 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro T2000) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RadeonT 780M).

Feature	Quadro T2000	RadeonT 780M
Encoder	NVENC 7.0	VCN 4.0
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP9	VCN 4.0
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro T2000 draws 62W versus the RadeonT 780M's 15W — a 122.1% difference. The RadeonT 780M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro T2000) vs 350W (RadeonT 780M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.

Feature	Quadro T2000	RadeonT 780M
TDP	62W	15W-76%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Length	0mm	0mm
Height	0mm	0mm
Slots	0	0
Perf/Watt	117.4	473.2+303%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is RadeonT 780M (2024 vs 2010).

Feature	Quadro T2000	RadeonT 780M
MSRP	$600	—
Codename	GF106	Phoenix
Release	December 24 2010	January 31 2024
Ranking	#902	#359

Search Quadro T2000 on Amazon

Search RadeonT 780M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.