
GRID P40-8Q

Quadro T2000
GRID P40-8Q vs Quadro T2000 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GRID P40-8Q vs Quadro T2000 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
GRID P40-8Q vs Quadro T2000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GRID P40-8Q
2015Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌400% HIGHER MSRP$3,000 MSRPvs$600 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.5 vs 12.1 G3D/$ ($3,000 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- ❌262.9% higher power demand at 225W vs 62W.
Quadro T2000
2010Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,400 less on MSRP ($600 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 384.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.1 vs 2.5 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 62W instead of 225W, a 163W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2010 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GRID P40-8Q vs Quadro T2000 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID P40-8Q
The GRID P40-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,507 points.

Quadro T2000
The Quadro T2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 24 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 62W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,279 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
The GRID P40-8Q scores 7,507 and the Quadro T2000 reaches 7,279 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P40-8Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Quadro T2000 uses Fermi, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID P40-8Q) vs 192 (Quadro T2000). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID P40-8Q) vs 0.48 TFLOPS (Quadro T2000).
| Feature | GRID P40-8Q | Quadro T2000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,507+3% | 7,279 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Fermi |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+967% | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.825 TFLOPS+905% | 0.48 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64+300% | 16 |
| TMUs | 128+300% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB+200% | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID P40-8Q | Quadro T2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GRID P40-8Q and 256-bit on the Quadro T2000. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID P40-8Q) vs 0.25 MB (Quadro T2000) — the GRID P40-8Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID P40-8Q | Quadro T2000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (GRID P40-8Q) vs 12.1 (Quadro T2000). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | GRID P40-8Q | Quadro T2000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 4.0 (GRID P40-8Q) vs NVENC 7.0 (Quadro T2000). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP7 vs PureVideo HD VP9. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GRID P40-8Q) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro T2000).
| Feature | GRID P40-8Q | Quadro T2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 4.0 | NVENC 7.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP7 | PureVideo HD VP9 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID P40-8Q draws 225W versus the Quadro T2000's 62W — a 113.6% difference. The Quadro T2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P40-8Q) vs 350W (Quadro T2000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GRID P40-8Q | Quadro T2000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 62W-72% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Perf/Watt | 33.4 | 117.4+251% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GRID P40-8Q came in at $3000, while the Quadro T2000 launched at $600. On MSRP, Quadro T2000 was 80% cheaper ($2400 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.5 (GRID P40-8Q) vs 12.1 (Quadro T2000) — the Quadro T2000 offers 384% better value. The newer card here is GRID P40-8Q (2015 vs 2010).
| Feature | GRID P40-8Q | Quadro T2000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3000 | $600-80% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.5 | 12.1+384% |
| Codename | GM204 | GF106 |
| Release | August 30 2015 | December 24 2010 |
| Ranking | #505 | #902 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














