GRID P40-8Q vs Quadro T2000

GRID P40-8Q

2015Core: 557 MHzBoost: 1178 MHz
Similar parts
····
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro T2000

2010Core: 625 MHz
Similar parts
···

GRID P40-8Q vs Quadro T2000 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID P40-8Q vs Quadro T2000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID P40-8Q

2015

Why buy it

  • More future proof: Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 400% HIGHER MSRP
    $3,000 MSRPvs$600 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.5 vs 12.1 G3D/$ ($3,000 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
  • 262.9% higher power demand at 225W vs 62W.

Quadro T2000

2010

Why buy it

  • Costs $2,400 less on MSRP ($600 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
  • Delivers 384.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.1 vs 2.5 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
  • Draws 62W instead of 225W, a 163W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2010 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GRID P40-8Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 3.1% in PassMark G3D (7,507 vs 7,279), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GRID P40-8Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2015 generation instead of 2010. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro T2000 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $2,400 cheaper on MSRP at $600 vs $3,000, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 384.8% (12.1 vs 2.5), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro T2000 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GRID P40-8Q has the stronger long-term case.

GRID P40-8Q vs Quadro T2000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GRID P40-8Q

The GRID P40-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,507 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro T2000

The Quadro T2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 24 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 62W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,279 points. Launch price was $599.

Graphics Performance

The GRID P40-8Q scores 7,507 and the Quadro T2000 reaches 7,279 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P40-8Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Quadro T2000 uses Fermi, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID P40-8Q) vs 192 (Quadro T2000). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID P40-8Q) vs 0.48 TFLOPS (Quadro T2000).

FeatureGRID P40-8QQuadro T2000
G3D Mark Score
7,507+3%
7,279
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
Fermi
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
2048+967%
192
Compute (TFLOPS)
4.825 TFLOPS+905%
0.48 TFLOPS
ROPs
64+300%
16
TMUs
128+300%
32
L1 Cache
768 KB+200%
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB+700%
0.25 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGRID P40-8QQuadro T2000
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GRID P40-8Q and 256-bit on the Quadro T2000. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID P40-8Q) vs 0.25 MB (Quadro T2000) — the GRID P40-8Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGRID P40-8QQuadro T2000
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
128-bit
256-bit+100%
L2 Cache
2 MB+700%
0.25 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.0 (GRID P40-8Q) vs 12.1 (Quadro T2000). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.

FeatureGRID P40-8QQuadro T2000
DirectX
12.0
12.1
Vulkan
1.1
1.3+18%
OpenGL
4.5
4.6+2%
Max Displays
0
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 4.0 (GRID P40-8Q) vs NVENC 7.0 (Quadro T2000). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP7 vs PureVideo HD VP9. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GRID P40-8Q) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro T2000).

FeatureGRID P40-8QQuadro T2000
Encoder
NVENC 4.0
NVENC 7.0
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP7
PureVideo HD VP9
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID P40-8Q draws 225W versus the Quadro T2000's 62W — a 113.6% difference. The Quadro T2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P40-8Q) vs 350W (Quadro T2000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.

FeatureGRID P40-8QQuadro T2000
TDP
225W
62W-72%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
267mm
0mm
Height
111mm
0mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Perf/Watt
33.4
117.4+251%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID P40-8Q came in at $3000, while the Quadro T2000 launched at $600. On MSRP, Quadro T2000 was 80% cheaper ($2400 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.5 (GRID P40-8Q) vs 12.1 (Quadro T2000) — the Quadro T2000 offers 384% better value. The newer card here is GRID P40-8Q (2015 vs 2010).

FeatureGRID P40-8QQuadro T2000
MSRP
$3000
$600-80%
Performance per Dollar
2.5
12.1+384%
Codename
GM204
GF106
Release
August 30 2015
December 24 2010
Ranking
#505
#902

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.