
GRID P40-8Q

T1000
GRID P40-8Q vs T1000 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GRID P40-8Q vs T1000 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
GRID P40-8Q vs T1000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GRID P40-8Q
2015Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌757.1% HIGHER MSRP$3,000 MSRPvs$350 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.5 vs 21.9 G3D/$ ($3,000 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
- ❌350% higher power demand at 225W vs 50W.
- ❌71.2% longer card at 267mm vs 156mm.
T1000
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,650 less on MSRP ($350 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 773.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.9 vs 2.5 G3D/$ ($350 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 225W, a 175W reduction.
- ✅Measures 156mm instead of 267mm, a 111mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GRID P40-8Q vs T1000 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID P40-8Q
The GRID P40-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,507 points.

T1000
The T1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 6 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1065 MHz to 1395 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,649 points.
Graphics Performance
The GRID P40-8Q scores 7,507 and the T1000 reaches 7,649 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P40-8Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the T1000 uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID P40-8Q) vs 896 (T1000). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID P40-8Q) vs 2.5 TFLOPS (T1000). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1395 MHz.
| Feature | GRID P40-8Q | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,507 | 7,649+2% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+129% | 896 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.825 TFLOPS+93% | 2.5 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 1395 MHz+18% |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 128+129% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB | 896 KB+17% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID P40-8Q | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GRID P40-8Q and 128-bit on the T1000. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID P40-8Q) vs 1 MB (T1000) — the GRID P40-8Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID P40-8Q | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (GRID P40-8Q) vs 12.1 (T1000). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | GRID P40-8Q | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.2+9% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 4.0 (GRID P40-8Q) vs NVENC 7.0 (T1000). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP7 vs PureVideo HD VP9. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GRID P40-8Q) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (T1000).
| Feature | GRID P40-8Q | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 4.0 | NVENC 7.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP7 | PureVideo HD VP9 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID P40-8Q draws 225W versus the T1000's 50W — a 127.3% difference. The T1000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P40-8Q) vs 350W (T1000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 156mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GRID P40-8Q | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 50W-78% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 156mm |
| Height | 111mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 33.4 | 153.0+358% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GRID P40-8Q came in at $3000, while the T1000 launched at $350. On MSRP, T1000 was 88.3% cheaper ($2650 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.5 (GRID P40-8Q) vs 21.9 (T1000) — the T1000 offers 776% better value. The newer card here is T1000 (2021 vs 2015).
| Feature | GRID P40-8Q | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3000 | $350-88% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.5 | 21.9+776% |
| Codename | GM204 | TU117 |
| Release | August 30 2015 | May 6 2021 |
| Ranking | #505 | #333 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














