
GRID P40-8Q

Radeon RX 6500
GRID P40-8Q vs Radeon RX 6500 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GRID P40-8Q vs Radeon RX 6500 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
GRID P40-8Q vs Radeon RX 6500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GRID P40-8Q
2015Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌1407.5% HIGHER MSRP$3,000 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.5 vs 38.2 G3D/$ ($3,000 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌200% higher power demand at 225W vs 75W.
Radeon RX 6500
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,801 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1428.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 38.2 vs 2.5 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Unknown architecture on Unknown node gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 225W, a 150W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GRID P40-8Q vs Radeon RX 6500 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID P40-8Q
The GRID P40-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,507 points.

Radeon RX 6500
The Radeon RX 6500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in sem dados. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,610 points.
Graphics Performance
The GRID P40-8Q scores 7,507 and the Radeon RX 6500 reaches 7,610 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance.
| Feature | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,507 | 7,610+1% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 6500 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GRID P40-8Q does not have comparable native support in the same tier.
| Feature | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GRID P40-8Q and 64-bit on the Radeon RX 6500.
| Feature | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (GRID P40-8Q) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 6500). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 2.
| Feature | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 0 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 4.0 (GRID P40-8Q) vs None (Radeon RX 6500). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP7 vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GRID P40-8Q) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 6500).
| Feature | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 4.0 | None |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP7 | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID P40-8Q draws 225W versus the Radeon RX 6500's 75W — a 100% difference. The Radeon RX 6500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P40-8Q) vs 400W (Radeon RX 6500). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 172mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 75W-67% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-13% | 400W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 172mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 33.4 | 101.5+204% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GRID P40-8Q came in at $3000, while the Radeon RX 6500 launched at $199. On MSRP, Radeon RX 6500 was 93.4% cheaper ($2801 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.5 (GRID P40-8Q) vs 38.2 (Radeon RX 6500) — the Radeon RX 6500 offers 1428% better value.
| Feature | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3000 | $199-93% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.5 | 38.2+1428% |
| Codename | GM204 | — |
| Release | August 30 2015 | sem dados |
| Ranking | #505 | #335 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














