GRID P40-8Q vs Radeon Pro 580X
GRID P40-8Q
Popular choices:
Radeon Pro 580X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GRID P40-8Q is positioned at rank 265 and the Radeon Pro 580X is on rank 117, so the Radeon Pro 580X offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID P40-8Q
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro 580X
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Pro 580X uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon Pro 580X likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GRID P40-8Q lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro 580X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.4% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID P40-8Q.
| Insight | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon Pro 580X |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) (14nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GRID P40-8Q offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $150 versus $200 for the Radeon Pro 580X, it costs 25% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 32.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon Pro 580X |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+32.7%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($150) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($200) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID P40-8Q and Radeon Pro 580X
GRID P40-8Q
The GRID P40-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,507 points.
Radeon Pro 580X
The Radeon Pro 580X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 18 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,540 points.
Graphics Performance
The GRID P40-8Q scores 7,507 and the Radeon Pro 580X reaches 7,540 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P40-8Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon Pro 580X uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID P40-8Q) vs 2,304 (Radeon Pro 580X). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID P40-8Q) vs 5.53 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 580X). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1200 MHz.
| Feature | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon Pro 580X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,507 | 7,540 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2304+13% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.825 TFLOPS | 5.53 TFLOPS+15% |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 1200 MHz+2% |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 128 | 144+13% |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB+33% | 576 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon Pro 580X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GRID P40-8Q comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 580X has 8 GB. The Radeon Pro 580X offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon Pro 580X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (GRID P40-8Q) vs 12.0 (Radeon Pro 580X). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon Pro 580X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 4.0 (GRID P40-8Q) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro 580X). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP7 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GRID P40-8Q) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro 580X).
| Feature | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon Pro 580X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 4.0 | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP7 | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID P40-8Q draws 225W versus the Radeon Pro 580X's 150W — a 40% difference. The Radeon Pro 580X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P40-8Q) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 580X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon Pro 580X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 150W-33% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 33.4 | 50.3+51% |
Value Analysis
The GRID P40-8Q launched at $3000 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the Radeon Pro 580X launched at $600 and now averages $200. The GRID P40-8Q costs 25% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 50.0 (GRID P40-8Q) vs 37.7 (Radeon Pro 580X) — the GRID P40-8Q offers 32.6% better value. The Radeon Pro 580X is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2015).
| Feature | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon Pro 580X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3000 | $600-80% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150-25% | $200 |
| Performance per Dollar | 50.0+33% | 37.7 |
| Codename | GM204 | Polaris 20 |
| Release | August 30 2015 | March 18 2019 |
| Ranking | #505 | #339 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GRID P40-8Q and Radeon Pro 580X
