Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

GRID P40-8Q vs Radeon RX 780

CPUCPUGPUGPU

GRID P40-8Q

2015Core: 557 MHzBoost: 1178 MHz
Similar parts
····
Buy on Amazon
VS
AMD

Radeon RX 780

2024Core: 1295 MHzBoost: 2335 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

GRID P40-8Q vs Radeon RX 780 Performance Spectrum

GRID P40-8Q
4 GB 225
7,507
0.0%
brand logoGeForce GTX 880M SLI
brand logoGeForce GTX 460 OEM
brand logoGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel)
brand logoGeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design
brand logoGeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design
brand logoGeForce GTX 1080
brand logoGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER
brand logoGeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop GPU
Radeon RX 780
4 GB 180
7,658
+2.0%
brand logoRadeon R9 270 / R7 370
brand logoRadeon R9 M395X
brand logoRadeon RX 5500M
brand logoRadeon R9 285
brand logoRadeon RX 7400
brand logoRadeon RX 7700S
brand logoRadeon RX 6700 XT
brand logoRadeon RX 7800 XT

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID P40-8Q vs Radeon RX 780: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID P40-8Q

2015

Why buy it

  • ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
  • ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • ❌
    501.2% HIGHER MSRP
    $3,000 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.5 vs 15.3 G3D/$ ($3,000 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
  • ❌25% higher power demand at 225W vs 180W.

Radeon RX 780

2024

Why buy it

  • ✅Costs $2,501 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 513.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.3 vs 2.5 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
  • ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
  • ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • ✅Draws 180W instead of 225W, a 45W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon RX 780 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2% in PassMark G3D (7,658 vs 7,507), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon RX 780 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer feature stack, with FSR 3 (2023) and FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023), while GRID P40-8Q is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support, a 5nm process instead of 28nm, 60 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2024 generation instead of 2015. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon RX 780 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $2,501 cheaper on MSRP at $499 vs $3,000, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 513.3% (15.3 vs 2.5), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GRID P40-8Q vs Radeon RX 780 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GRID P40-8Q

The GRID P40-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,507 points.

AMD

Radeon RX 780

The Radeon RX 780 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 11 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2335 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,658 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID P40-8Q scores 7,507 and the Radeon RX 780 reaches 7,658 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P40-8Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon RX 780 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID P40-8Q) vs 3,840 (Radeon RX 780). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID P40-8Q) vs 35.87 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 780). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 2335 MHz.

FeatureGRID P40-8QRadeon RX 780
G3D Mark Score
7,507
7,658+2%
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
RDNA 3.0
Process Node
28 nm
5 nm
Shading Units
2048
3840+88%
Compute (TFLOPS)
4.825 TFLOPS
35.87 TFLOPS+643%
Boost Clock
1178 MHz
2335 MHz+98%
ROPs
64
96+50%
TMUs
128
240+88%
L1 Cache
768 KB
768 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
4 MB+100%
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 780 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GRID P40-8Q does not have comparable native support in the same tier.

FeatureGRID P40-8QRadeon RX 780
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR 3
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GRID P40-8Q and System on the Radeon RX 780. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID P40-8Q) vs 4 MB (Radeon RX 780) — the Radeon RX 780 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGRID P40-8QRadeon RX 780
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
Shared
Bus Width
128-bit
System
L2 Cache
2 MB
4 MB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.0 (GRID P40-8Q) vs 12 (12_2) (Radeon RX 780). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.

FeatureGRID P40-8QRadeon RX 780
DirectX
12.0
12 (12_2)
Vulkan
1.1
1.4+27%
OpenGL
4.5
4.6+2%
Max Displays
0
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 4.0 (GRID P40-8Q) vs RDNA 3 Dual Media Engine (Radeon RX 780). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP7 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GRID P40-8Q) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 780).

FeatureGRID P40-8QRadeon RX 780
Encoder
NVENC 4.0
RDNA 3 Dual Media Engine
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP7
VCN 4.0
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID P40-8Q draws 225W versus the Radeon RX 780's 180W — a 22.2% difference. The Radeon RX 780 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P40-8Q) vs 350W (Radeon RX 780). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGRID P40-8QRadeon RX 780
TDP
225W
180W-20%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
267mm
—
Height
111mm
—
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
—
85°C
Perf/Watt
33.4
42.5+27%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID P40-8Q came in at $3000, while the Radeon RX 780 launched at $499. On MSRP, Radeon RX 780 was 83.4% cheaper ($2501 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.5 (GRID P40-8Q) vs 15.3 (Radeon RX 780) — the Radeon RX 780 offers 512% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX 780 (2024 vs 2015).

FeatureGRID P40-8QRadeon RX 780
MSRP
$3000
$499-83%
Performance per Dollar
2.5
15.3+512%
Codename
GM204
Navi 32
Release
August 30 2015
September 11 2024
Ranking
#505
#131
Search GRID P40-8Q on AmazonSearch Radeon RX 780 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.