GRID P40-8Q vs Radeon RX 780
GRID P40-8Q
Popular choices:
Radeon RX 780
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GRID P40-8Q is positioned at rank 265 and the Radeon RX 780 is on rank 296, so the GRID P40-8Q offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID P40-8Q
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 780
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX 780 is significantly newer (2024 vs 2015). The Radeon RX 780 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GRID P40-8Q lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 780 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID P40-8Q.
| Insight | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon RX 780 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GRID P40-8Q offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $150 versus $721 for the Radeon RX 780, it costs 79% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 371.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon RX 780 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+371.2%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($150) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($721) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID P40-8Q and Radeon RX 780
GRID P40-8Q
The GRID P40-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,507 points.
Radeon RX 780
The Radeon RX 780 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 11 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2335 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,658 points.
Graphics Performance
The GRID P40-8Q scores 7,507 and the Radeon RX 780 reaches 7,658 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P40-8Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon RX 780 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID P40-8Q) vs 3,840 (Radeon RX 780). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID P40-8Q) vs 35.87 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 780). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 2335 MHz.
| Feature | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon RX 780 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,507 | 7,658+2% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 3840+88% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.825 TFLOPS | 35.87 TFLOPS+643% |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 2335 MHz+98% |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 128 | 240+88% |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB | 768 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 780 is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GRID P40-8Q lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon RX 780 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 3 (Native) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID P40-8Q) vs 4 MB (Radeon RX 780) — the Radeon RX 780 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon RX 780 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (GRID P40-8Q) vs 12 (12_2) (Radeon RX 780). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon RX 780 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12 (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.4+27% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 4.0 (GRID P40-8Q) vs RDNA 3 Dual Media Engine (Radeon RX 780). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP7 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GRID P40-8Q) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 780).
| Feature | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon RX 780 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 4.0 | RDNA 3 Dual Media Engine |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP7 | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID P40-8Q draws 225W versus the Radeon RX 780's 180W — a 22.2% difference. The Radeon RX 780 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P40-8Q) vs 350W (Radeon RX 780). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon RX 780 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 180W-20% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 33.4 | 42.5+27% |
Value Analysis
The GRID P40-8Q launched at $3000 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the Radeon RX 780 launched at $499 and now averages $721. The GRID P40-8Q costs 79.2% less ($571 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 50.0 (GRID P40-8Q) vs 10.6 (Radeon RX 780) — the GRID P40-8Q offers 371.7% better value. The Radeon RX 780 is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2015).
| Feature | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon RX 780 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3000 | $499-83% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150-79% | $721 |
| Performance per Dollar | 50.0+372% | 10.6 |
| Codename | GM204 | Navi 32 |
| Release | August 30 2015 | September 11 2024 |
| Ranking | #505 | #131 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GRID P40-8Q and Radeon RX 780
