
GeForce RTX 2050
Popular choices:

GRID P40-8Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2050
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,850 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1955.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.4 vs 2.5 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than GRID P40-8Q: it remains the more sensible modern option while GRID P40-8Q is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
GRID P40-8Q
2015Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌1900% HIGHER MSRP$3,000 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.5 vs 51.4 G3D/$ ($3,000 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 2050
2018GRID P40-8Q
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,850 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1955.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.4 vs 2.5 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than GRID P40-8Q: it remains the more sensible modern option while GRID P40-8Q is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌1900% HIGHER MSRP$3,000 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.5 vs 51.4 G3D/$ ($3,000 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 2050 better than GRID P40-8Q?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GRID P40-8Q still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2050 | GRID P40-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 120 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 93 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 105 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 56 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 50 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 16 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2050 | GRID P40-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 347 FPS | 162 FPS |
| medium | 278 FPS | 128 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 174 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 244 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 201 FPS | 92 FPS |
| high | 174 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 130 FPS | 57 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 118 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 52 FPS |
| high | 85 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 66 FPS | 32 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2050 | GRID P40-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 347 FPS | 338 FPS |
| medium | 278 FPS | 270 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 225 FPS |
| ultra | 174 FPS | 169 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 260 FPS | 253 FPS |
| medium | 208 FPS | 203 FPS |
| high | 174 FPS | 169 FPS |
| ultra | 130 FPS | 127 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 139 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 116 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 84 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2050 | GRID P40-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 331 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 277 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 133 FPS |
| ultra | 174 FPS | 103 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 255 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 208 FPS | 110 FPS |
| high | 174 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 130 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 130 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 114 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 36 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2050 and GRID P40-8Q

GeForce RTX 2050
GeForce RTX 2050
The GeForce RTX 2050 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 20 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1710 MHz. It has 2944 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 215W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,714 points. Launch price was $699.

GRID P40-8Q
GRID P40-8Q
The GRID P40-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,507 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 2050 scores 7,714 and the GRID P40-8Q reaches 7,507 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 2050 is built on Turing while the GRID P40-8Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,944 (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 2,048 (GRID P40-8Q). Raw compute: 10.07 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID P40-8Q). Boost clocks: 1710 MHz vs 1178 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 | GRID P40-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,714+3% | 7,507 |
| Architecture | Turing | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2944+44% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 10.07 TFLOPS+109% | 4.825 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1710 MHz+45% | 1178 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 184+44% | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 2.9 MB+287% | 0.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2050 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The GRID P40-8Q relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 | GRID P40-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 2 MB (GRID P40-8Q) — the GeForce RTX 2050 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 | GRID P40-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 12.0 (GRID P40-8Q). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 | GRID P40-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8.0 (GeForce RTX 2050) vs NVENC 4.0 (GRID P40-8Q). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP11 vs PureVideo HD VP7. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 2050) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GRID P40-8Q).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 | GRID P40-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8.0 | NVENC 4.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP11 | PureVideo HD VP7 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2050 draws 215W versus the GRID P40-8Q's 225W — a 4.5% difference. The GeForce RTX 2050 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 350W (GRID P40-8Q). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 | GRID P40-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 215W-4% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 35.9+7% | 33.4 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 2050 launched at $150 MSRP, while the GRID P40-8Q launched at $3000. The GeForce RTX 2050 costs 95% less ($2850 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 51.4 (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 2.5 (GRID P40-8Q) — the GeForce RTX 2050 offers 1956% better value. The GeForce RTX 2050 is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 | GRID P40-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-95% | $3000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 51.4+1956% | 2.5 |
| Codename | TU104 | GM204 |
| Release | September 20 2018 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #94 | #505 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












