Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

GeForce RTX 2050 vs GRID P40-8Q

CPUCPUGPUGPU
NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 2050

2018Core: 1515 MHzBoost: 1710 MHz
RTX family
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS

GRID P40-8Q

2015Core: 557 MHzBoost: 1178 MHz
Similar parts
····
Buy on Amazon

GeForce RTX 2050 vs GRID P40-8Q Performance Spectrum

GeForce RTX 2050
4 GB 215
7,714
+2.8%
brand logoGeForce GTX 880M SLI
brand logoGeForce GTX 1050 3GB
brand logoGeForce GTX 770
brand logoGeForce GTX 970XM FORCE
brand logoGeForce GTX 1660
brand logoGeForce GTX 1080
brand logoGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER
brand logoGeForce RTX 3070 Ti
GRID P40-8Q
4 GB 225
7,507
0.0%
brand logoGeForce GTX 880M SLI
brand logoGeForce GTX 460 OEM
brand logoGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel)
brand logoGeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design
brand logoGeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design
brand logoGeForce GTX 1080
brand logoGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER
brand logoGeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 2050 vs GRID P40-8Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 2050

2018

Why buy it

  • ✅Costs $2,850 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 1955.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.4 vs 2.5 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
  • ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
  • ✅GRID P40-8Q is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so GeForce RTX 2050 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

GRID P40-8Q

2015

Why buy it

  • ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
  • ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • ❌
    1900% HIGHER MSRP
    $3,000 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.5 vs 51.4 G3D/$ ($3,000 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce RTX 2050 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.8% in PassMark G3D (7,714 vs 7,507), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce RTX 2050 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 12nm process instead of 28nm, 46 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2018 generation instead of 2015. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 2050 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $2,850 cheaper on MSRP at $150 vs $3,000, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1955.1% (51.4 vs 2.5), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce RTX 2050 vs GRID P40-8Q Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 2050

The GeForce RTX 2050 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 20 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1710 MHz. It has 2944 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 215W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,714 points. Launch price was $699.

NVIDIA

GRID P40-8Q

The GRID P40-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,507 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce RTX 2050 scores 7,714 and the GRID P40-8Q reaches 7,507 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 2050 is built on Turing while the GRID P40-8Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,944 (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 2,048 (GRID P40-8Q). Raw compute: 10.07 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID P40-8Q). Boost clocks: 1710 MHz vs 1178 MHz.

FeatureGeForce RTX 2050GRID P40-8Q
G3D Mark Score
7,714+3%
7,507
Architecture
Turing
Maxwell 2.0
Process Node
12 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
2944+44%
2048
Compute (TFLOPS)
10.07 TFLOPS+109%
4.825 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1710 MHz+45%
1178 MHz
ROPs
64
64
TMUs
184+44%
128
L1 Cache
2.9 MB+287%
0.75 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB+100%
2 MB
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 2050 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The GRID P40-8Q leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce RTX 2050GRID P40-8Q
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 2 Super Resolution
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce RTX 2050 and 128-bit on the GRID P40-8Q. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 2 MB (GRID P40-8Q) — the GeForce RTX 2050 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce RTX 2050GRID P40-8Q
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
4 MB+100%
2 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 12.0 (GRID P40-8Q). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

FeatureGeForce RTX 2050GRID P40-8Q
DirectX
12.2+2%
12.0
Vulkan
1.3+18%
1.1
OpenGL
4.6+2%
4.5
Max Displays
4
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 8.0 (GeForce RTX 2050) vs NVENC 4.0 (GRID P40-8Q). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP11 vs PureVideo HD VP7. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 2050) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GRID P40-8Q).

FeatureGeForce RTX 2050GRID P40-8Q
Encoder
NVENC 8.0
NVENC 4.0
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP11
PureVideo HD VP7
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 2050 draws 215W versus the GRID P40-8Q's 225W — a 4.5% difference. The GeForce RTX 2050 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 350W (GRID P40-8Q). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.

FeatureGeForce RTX 2050GRID P40-8Q
TDP
215W-4%
225W
Recommended PSU
300W-14%
350W
Power Connector
6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
267mm
Height
0mm
111mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Perf/Watt
35.9+7%
33.4
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 2050 came in at $150, while the GRID P40-8Q launched at $3000. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 2050 was 95% cheaper ($2850 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 51.4 (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 2.5 (GRID P40-8Q) — the GeForce RTX 2050 offers 1956% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 2050 (2018 vs 2015).

FeatureGeForce RTX 2050GRID P40-8Q
MSRP
$150-95%
$3000
Performance per Dollar
51.4+1956%
2.5
Codename
TU104
GM204
Release
September 20 2018
August 30 2015
Ranking
#94
#505
Search GeForce RTX 2050 on AmazonSearch GRID P40-8Q on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.