
Quadro M5000M

Quadro T2000
Quadro M5000M vs Quadro T2000 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro M5000M vs Quadro T2000 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro M5000M vs Quadro T2000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro M5000M
2015Why buy it
- ✅328.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 12.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- ❌61.3% higher power demand at 100W vs 62W.
Quadro T2000
2010Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 62W instead of 100W, a 38W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro M5000M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2010 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro M5000M vs Quadro T2000 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro M5000M
The Quadro M5000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 975 MHz to 1051 MHz. It has 1,536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,056 points.

Quadro T2000
The Quadro T2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 24 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 62W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,279 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro M5000M scores 7,056 and the Quadro T2000 reaches 7,279 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M5000M is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Quadro T2000 uses Fermi, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 1 (Quadro M5000M) vs 192 (Quadro T2000). Raw compute: 2.995 TFLOPS (Quadro M5000M) vs 0.48 TFLOPS (Quadro T2000).
| Feature | Quadro M5000M | Quadro T2000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,056 | 7,279+3% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Fermi |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 1,536+700% | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.995 TFLOPS+524% | 0.48 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64+300% | 16 |
| TMUs | 96+200% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 576 KB+125% | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro M5000M | Quadro T2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro M5000M has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro T2000 carries 4 GB. Quadro M5000M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro M5000M and 256-bit on the Quadro T2000. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro M5000M) vs 0.25 MB (Quadro T2000) — the Quadro M5000M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro M5000M | Quadro T2000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro M5000M) vs 12.1 (Quadro T2000). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro M5000M | Quadro T2000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5.0 (Quadro M5000M) vs NVENC 7.0 (Quadro T2000). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs PureVideo HD VP9. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264 (Quadro M5000M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro T2000).
| Feature | Quadro M5000M | Quadro T2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5.0 | NVENC 7.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 | PureVideo HD VP9 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro M5000M draws 100W versus the Quadro T2000's 62W — a 46.9% difference. The Quadro T2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M5000M) vs 350W (Quadro T2000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Quadro M5000M | Quadro T2000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 62W-38% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 70.6 | 117.4+66% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Quadro M5000M (2015 vs 2010).
| Feature | Quadro M5000M | Quadro T2000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $600 |
| Codename | GM204 | GF106 |
| Release | August 18 2015 | December 24 2010 |
| Ranking | #353 | #902 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














