Quadro M5000M vs Radeon Pro W5500X

NVIDIA

Quadro M5000M

2015Core: 975 MHzBoost: 1051 MHz
Similar parts
···
VS
AMD

Radeon Pro W5500X

2019Core: 1187 MHzBoost: 1757 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Quadro M5000M vs Radeon Pro W5500X Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro M5000M vs Radeon Pro W5500X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro M5000M vs Radeon Pro W5500X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro M5000M

2015

Why buy it

  • 11.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Draws 100W instead of 125W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2015 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 12.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $599 MSRP).

Radeon Pro W5500X

2019

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Quadro M5000M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 25% higher power demand at 125W vs 100W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro M5000M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 11.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon Pro W5500X instead at 7,351 vs 7,056, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon Pro W5500X is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 7nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2015. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon Pro W5500X makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Quadro M5000M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Quadro M5000M vs Radeon Pro W5500X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro M5000M

The Quadro M5000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 975 MHz to 1051 MHz. It has 1,536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,056 points.

AMD

Radeon Pro W5500X

The Radeon Pro W5500X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 11 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1187 MHz to 1757 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,351 points. Launch price was $599.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro M5000M scores 7,056 and the Radeon Pro W5500X reaches 7,351 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M5000M is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon Pro W5500X uses RDNA 1.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1 (Quadro M5000M) vs 1,536 (Radeon Pro W5500X). Raw compute: 2.995 TFLOPS (Quadro M5000M) vs 5.398 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W5500X). Boost clocks: 1051 MHz vs 1757 MHz.

FeatureQuadro M5000MRadeon Pro W5500X
G3D Mark Score
7,056
7,351+4%
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
RDNA 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
7 nm
Shading Units
1,536
1536
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.995 TFLOPS
5.398 TFLOPS+80%
Boost Clock
1051 MHz
1757 MHz+67%
ROPs
64+100%
32
TMUs
96
96
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro M5000MRadeon Pro W5500X
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro M5000M and 128-bit on the Radeon Pro W5500X.

FeatureQuadro M5000MRadeon Pro W5500X
VRAM Capacity
8 GB
8 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
256-bit+100%
128-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro M5000M) vs 12.0 (Radeon Pro W5500X). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 5.

FeatureQuadro M5000MRadeon Pro W5500X
DirectX
12.1
12.0
Vulkan
1.4+8%
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
5+25%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5.0 (Quadro M5000M) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro W5500X). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264 (Quadro M5000M) vs H.264,H.265 (Radeon Pro W5500X).

FeatureQuadro M5000MRadeon Pro W5500X
Encoder
NVENC 5.0
VCN 2.0
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP6
VCN 2.0
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264
H.264,H.265
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro M5000M draws 100W versus the Radeon Pro W5500X's 125W — a 22.2% difference. The Quadro M5000M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M5000M) vs 350W (Radeon Pro W5500X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureQuadro M5000MRadeon Pro W5500X
TDP
100W-20%
125W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Perf/Watt
70.6+20%
58.8
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon Pro W5500X (2019 vs 2015).

FeatureQuadro M5000MRadeon Pro W5500X
MSRP
$599
Codename
GM204
Navi 14
Release
August 18 2015
December 11 2019
Ranking
#353
#345

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.