Quadro M5000M vs Quadro P4000 Max-Q

NVIDIA

Quadro M5000M

2015Core: 975 MHzBoost: 1051 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
NVIDIA

Quadro P4000 Max-Q

2017Core: 1114 MHzBoost: 1228 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Quadro M5000M

2015

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

  • Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.

Quadro P4000 Max-Q

2017

Why buy it

  • More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 16nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.

Quick Answers

So, is Quadro P4000 Max-Q better than Quadro M5000M?
Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 7,056 vs 7,500 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Quadro P4000 Max-Q is the overall package: you are getting a newer generation, no meaningful modern upscaling stack.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro M5000M is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more VRAM at 8 GB instead of 4 GB. That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Quadro P4000 Max-Q can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around Unknown MSRP. Quadro P4000 Max-Q is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. Quadro P4000 Max-Q is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 6.3% higher G3D Mark. Quadro M5000M is the more forward-looking alternative, so it still has a real case if you care more about future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.
When does Quadro M5000M make more sense than Quadro P4000 Max-Q?
Yes. Quadro M5000M is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is future-proofing and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Quadro P4000 Max-Q. The trade-off is that Quadro P4000 Max-Q currently gives you 6.3% higher G3D Mark. G3D-per-dollar is basically tied between them.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetQuadro M5000MQuadro P4000 Max-Q
1080p
low105 FPS82 FPS
medium89 FPS71 FPS
high73 FPS60 FPS
ultra48 FPS40 FPS
1440p
low89 FPS72 FPS
medium75 FPS63 FPS
high55 FPS47 FPS
ultra36 FPS30 FPS
4K
low36 FPS26 FPS
medium32 FPS24 FPS
high20 FPS17 FPS
ultra17 FPS14 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetQuadro M5000MQuadro P4000 Max-Q
1080p
low203 FPS222 FPS
medium174 FPS189 FPS
high128 FPS144 FPS
ultra100 FPS115 FPS
1440p
low151 FPS166 FPS
medium125 FPS137 FPS
high100 FPS109 FPS
ultra75 FPS86 FPS
4K
low85 FPS96 FPS
medium71 FPS77 FPS
high59 FPS64 FPS
ultra43 FPS48 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetQuadro M5000MQuadro P4000 Max-Q
1080p
low318 FPS338 FPS
medium254 FPS270 FPS
high212 FPS225 FPS
ultra159 FPS169 FPS
1440p
low238 FPS253 FPS
medium191 FPS202 FPS
high159 FPS169 FPS
ultra119 FPS127 FPS
4K
low159 FPS169 FPS
medium127 FPS135 FPS
high106 FPS112 FPS
ultra79 FPS84 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetQuadro M5000MQuadro P4000 Max-Q
1080p
low219 FPS162 FPS
medium186 FPS133 FPS
high152 FPS116 FPS
ultra127 FPS98 FPS
1440p
low172 FPS118 FPS
medium149 FPS99 FPS
high117 FPS87 FPS
ultra96 FPS73 FPS
4K
low97 FPS67 FPS
medium76 FPS54 FPS
high60 FPS42 FPS
ultra48 FPS32 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro M5000M and Quadro P4000 Max-Q

NVIDIA

Quadro M5000M

The Quadro M5000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 975 MHz to 1051 MHz. It has 1,536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,056 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro P4000 Max-Q

The Quadro P4000 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1114 MHz to 1228 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,500 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Quadro M5000M scores 7,056 versus the Quadro P4000 Max-Q's 7,500 — the Quadro P4000 Max-Q leads by 6.3%. The Quadro M5000M is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Quadro P4000 Max-Q uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 1 (Quadro M5000M) vs 1,792 (Quadro P4000 Max-Q). Raw compute: 2.995 TFLOPS (Quadro M5000M) vs 4.401 TFLOPS (Quadro P4000 Max-Q). Boost clocks: 1051 MHz vs 1228 MHz.

FeatureQuadro M5000MQuadro P4000 Max-Q
G3D Mark Score
7,056
7,500+6%
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
Pascal
Process Node
28 nm
16 nm
Shading Units
1,536
1792+17%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.995 TFLOPS
4.401 TFLOPS+47%
Boost Clock
1051 MHz
1228 MHz+17%
ROPs
64
64
TMUs
96
112+17%
L1 Cache
576 KB
672 KB+17%
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro M5000MQuadro P4000 Max-Q
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro M5000M comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P4000 Max-Q has 4 GB. The Quadro M5000M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit.

FeatureQuadro M5000MQuadro P4000 Max-Q
VRAM Capacity
8 GB+100%
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
256-bit
256-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro M5000M) vs 12.1 (Quadro P4000 Max-Q). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureQuadro M5000MQuadro P4000 Max-Q
DirectX
12.1
12.1
Vulkan
1.4+8%
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5.0 (Quadro M5000M) vs NVENC 6.0 (Quadro P4000 Max-Q). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs PureVideo HD VP8. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264 (Quadro M5000M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P4000 Max-Q).

FeatureQuadro M5000MQuadro P4000 Max-Q
Encoder
NVENC 5.0
NVENC 6.0
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP6
PureVideo HD VP8
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro M5000M draws 100W versus the Quadro P4000 Max-Q's 100W — a 0% difference. The Quadro P4000 Max-Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M5000M) vs 350W (Quadro P4000 Max-Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.

FeatureQuadro M5000MQuadro P4000 Max-Q
TDP
100W
100W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
0mm
Height
0mm
0mm
Slots
0
0
Perf/Watt
70.6
75.0+6%