Quadro M5000M vs Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS

NVIDIA

Quadro M5000M

2015Core: 975 MHzBoost: 1051 MHz
Similar parts
···
VS

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS

2023Boost: 1500 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Quadro M5000M vs Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro M5000M vs Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro M5000M

2015

Why buy it

  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).

Trade-offs

  • 2015 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 28.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
  • 150% higher power demand at 100W vs 40W.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS

2023

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 28.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Quadro M5000M is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 40W instead of 100W, a 60W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Older hardware, Unknown of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro M5000M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.8% in PassMark G3D (7,056 vs 7,000), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 4nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2015. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Quadro M5000M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Quadro M5000M vs Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro M5000M

The Quadro M5000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 975 MHz to 1051 MHz. It has 1,536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,056 points.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS

The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS is manufactured by Qualcomm. It was released in October 26 2023. The boost clock speed is 1500 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,000 points.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro M5000M scores 7,056 and the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS reaches 7,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. Shader units: 1 (Quadro M5000M) vs 1,536 (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS). Boost clocks: 1051 MHz vs 1500 MHz.

FeatureQuadro M5000MQualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
G3D Mark Score
7,056
7,000
Process Node
28 nm
4 nm
Shading Units
1,536
1536
Boost Clock
1051 MHz
1500 MHz+43%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro M5000MQualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro M5000M has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS carries 0 MB. Quadro M5000M gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro M5000M and 128-bit on the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS.

FeatureQuadro M5000MQualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
VRAM Capacity
8 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR6
Shared
Bus Width
256-bit+100%
128-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro M5000M) vs 12.1 (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs ES 3.2. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

FeatureQuadro M5000MQualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
DirectX
12.1
12.1
Vulkan
1.4+8%
1.3
OpenGL
4.6+44%
ES 3.2
Max Displays
4+33%
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5.0 (Quadro M5000M) vs Adreno VPU (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs Adreno VPU. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264 (Quadro M5000M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS).

FeatureQuadro M5000MQualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
Encoder
NVENC 5.0
Adreno VPU
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP6
Adreno VPU
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro M5000M draws 100W versus the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS's 40W — a 85.7% difference. The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M5000M) vs 1W (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.

FeatureQuadro M5000MQualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
TDP
100W
40W-60%
Recommended PSU
350W
1W-100%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Integrated
Length
0mm
0mm
Height
0mm
0mm
Slots
0
0
Perf/Watt
70.6
175.0+148%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS (2023 vs 2015).

FeatureQuadro M5000MQualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
MSRP
$250
Codename
GM204
Release
August 18 2015
October 26 2023
Ranking
#353
#482

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.