Quadro M5000M vs GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro M5000M is positioned at rank 13 and the GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) is on rank 50, so the Quadro M5000M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro M5000M

#1

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

209%

#13

Quadro M5000M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#26

RTX A400

MSRP: $135|Avg: $135

63%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)

#16

Radeon RX 7600S

MSRP: $269|Avg: $250

100%

#40

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

187%

#42

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

169%

#43

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

169%

#47

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

154%

#48

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

153%

#50

GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $75

100%

#53

GeForce GTX 980M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $80

97%

#54

GeForce GTX 770M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $40

96%

#58

GeForce 770M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $40

93%

#62

Radeon 820M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $25

92%

#65

GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

91%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro M5000M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro M5000M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.3% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile).

Insight	Quadro M5000M	GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+1.3%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.3%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019))	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro M5000M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro M5000M Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro M5000M and GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)

Quadro M5000M

The Quadro M5000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 975 MHz to 1051 MHz. It has 1,536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,056 points.

GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)

The GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1350 MHz to 1485 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,968 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro M5000M scores 7,056 and the GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) reaches 6,968 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M5000M is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1 (Quadro M5000M) vs 1,024 (GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)). Raw compute: 2.995 TFLOPS (Quadro M5000M) vs 3.041 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)). Boost clocks: 1051 MHz vs 1485 MHz.

Feature	Quadro M5000M	GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)
G3D Mark Score	7,056+1%	6,968
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	Turing
Process Node	28 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	1,536+50%	1024
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.995 TFLOPS	3.041 TFLOPS+2%
Boost Clock	1051 MHz	1485 MHz+41%
ROPs	64+100%	32
TMUs	96+50%	64
L1 Cache	0.56 MB	1 MB+79%
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro M5000M	GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro M5000M comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) has 4 GB. The Quadro M5000M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro M5000M) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)) — the Quadro M5000M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro M5000M	GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+100%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro M5000M) vs 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

Feature	Quadro M5000M	GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)
DirectX	12.1	12 (12_1)
Vulkan	1.4+8%	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4+33%	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5.0 (Quadro M5000M) vs NVENC 6th Gen (Volta/Turing) (GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs NVDEC 4th Gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264 (Quadro M5000M) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)).

Feature	Quadro M5000M	GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)
Encoder	NVENC 5.0	NVENC 6th Gen (Volta/Turing)
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP6	NVDEC 4th Gen
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264	H.264,H.265,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro M5000M draws 100W versus the GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)'s 50W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M5000M) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.