
Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU vs GeForce GTX 645

Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 645
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU is positioned at rank #635 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU is significantly newer (2018 vs 2010). The Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 645 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX 645 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU | GeForce GTX 645 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Legacy) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 645 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $20 versus $400 for the Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU, it costs 95% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 1893.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU | GeForce GTX 645 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1893.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($400) | ✅More affordable ($20) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU and GeForce GTX 645
Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU
The Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU is manufactured by Qualcomm. It was released in December 6 2018. The thermal design power (TDP) is 7W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,886 points.

GeForce GTX 645
The GeForce GTX 645 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 31 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,880 points. Launch price was $279.
Graphics Performance
The Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU scores 1,886 and the GeForce GTX 645 reaches 1,880 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance.
| Feature | Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU | GeForce GTX 645 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,886 | 1,880 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 40 nm |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU | GeForce GTX 645 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 645 has 1 GB. The GeForce GTX 645 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU | GeForce GTX 645 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 135 GB/s | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU draws 7W versus the GeForce GTX 645's 200W — a 186.5% difference. The Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 645). Power connectors: Integrated vs None.
| Feature | Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU | GeForce GTX 645 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 7W-97% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 300W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | None |
| Length | — | 147mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 269.4+2766% | 9.4 |
Value Analysis
The Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU launched at $899 MSRP and currently averages $400, while the GeForce GTX 645 launched at $150 and now averages $20. The GeForce GTX 645 costs 95% less ($380 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 4.7 (Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU) vs 94.0 (GeForce GTX 645) — the GeForce GTX 645 offers 1900% better value. The Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2010).
| Feature | Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU | GeForce GTX 645 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $899 | $150-83% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $400 | $20-95% |
| Performance per Dollar | 4.7 | 94.0+1900% |
| Codename | — | GF100 |
| Release | December 6 2018 | May 31 2010 |
| Ranking | #916 | #618 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















