CPU
GPU
Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU
Popular choices:
Intel UHD Graphics 770
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU is positioned at rank #635 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Intel UHD Graphics 770 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU.
| Insight | Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU | Intel UHD Graphics 770 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Legacy) | Generation 12.2 (2022−2023) (10nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Intel UHD Graphics 770 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU and Intel UHD Graphics 770
Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU
The Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU is manufactured by Qualcomm. It was released in December 6 2018. The thermal design power (TDP) is 7W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,886 points.
Intel UHD Graphics 770
The Intel UHD Graphics 770 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 27 2022. It features the Generation 12.2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,914 points.
Graphics Performance
The Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU scores 1,886 and the Intel UHD Graphics 770 reaches 1,914 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance.
| Feature | Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU | Intel UHD Graphics 770 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,886 | 1,914+1% |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 10 nm |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU | Intel UHD Graphics 770 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 0 MB of Shared. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.
| Feature | Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU | Intel UHD Graphics 770 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | Shared | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 135 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
Power & Dimensions
The Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU draws 7W versus the Intel UHD Graphics 770's 15W — a 72.7% difference. The Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU) vs 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 770). Power connectors: Integrated vs Integrated.
| Feature | Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU | Intel UHD Graphics 770 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 7W-53% | 15W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W | 1W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | Integrated |
| Perf/Watt | 269.4+111% | 127.6 |
Value Analysis
The Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU launched at $899 MSRP and currently averages $400, while the Intel UHD Graphics 770 launched at $0 and now averages $0. The Intel UHD Graphics 770 costs 100+% less ($400 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 4.7 (Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU) vs Infinity (Intel UHD Graphics 770) — the Intel UHD Graphics 770 offers Infinity% better value. The Intel UHD Graphics 770 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2018).
| Feature | Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU | Intel UHD Graphics 770 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $899 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $400 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 4.7 | Infinity |
| Codename | — | Raptor Lake GT1 |
| Release | December 6 2018 | September 27 2022 |
| Ranking | #916 | #644 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU and Intel UHD Graphics 770
