Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU vs Tesla C2070

Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU

2018
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Tesla C2070

2011Core: 574 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU vs Tesla C2070 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU vs Tesla C2070: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU

2018

Why buy it

  • Draws 7W instead of 238W, a 231W reduction.
  • More future proof: Unknown architecture on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2018 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).

Tesla C2070

2011

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs Unknown).
  • Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Tesla C2070 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • 2011 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 3300% higher power demand at 238W vs 7W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Tesla C2070 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.8% in PassMark G3D (3,121 vs 3,035), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Tesla C2070 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 6 GB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Tesla C2070 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU vs Tesla C2070 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU

The Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU is manufactured by Qualcomm. It was released in December 6 2018. The thermal design power (TDP) is 7W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,035 points.

NVIDIA

Tesla C2070

The Tesla C2070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 238W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,121 points.

Graphics Performance

The Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU scores 3,035 and the Tesla C2070 reaches 3,121 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance.

FeatureQualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPUTesla C2070
G3D Mark Score
3,035
3,121+3%
Process Node
7 nm
40 nm

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPUTesla C2070
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Tesla C2070 carries 6 GB. Tesla C2070 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU and 64-bit on the Tesla C2070.

FeatureQualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPUTesla C2070
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
6 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Bus Width
System
64-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU) vs 12 (11_0) (Tesla C2070). OpenGL: ES 3.2 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 1.

FeatureQualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPUTesla C2070
DirectX
12.1
12 (11_0)
OpenGL
ES 3.2
4.6+44%
Max Displays
3+200%
1
🎬

Media & Encoding

Supported codecs: AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 (Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Tesla C2070).

FeatureQualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPUTesla C2070
Encoder
VPU
Decoder
VPU
Codecs
AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU draws 7W versus the Tesla C2070's 238W — a 188.6% difference. The Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU) vs 350W (Tesla C2070). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureQualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPUTesla C2070
TDP
7W-97%
238W
Recommended PSU
1W-100%
350W
Power Connector
Integrated
PCIe-powered
Length
248mm
Slots
2
Perf/Watt
433.6+3210%
13.1
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU came in at $0, while the Tesla C2070 launched at $1499. On MSRP, Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU was 100+% cheaper ($1499 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU) vs 2.1 (Tesla C2070) — the Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU (2018 vs 2011).

FeatureQualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPUTesla C2070
MSRP
$0-100%
$1499
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
2.1
Codename
GF100
Release
December 6 2018
July 25 2011
Ranking
#916
#575

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.