Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU
Tesla C2075
Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU vs Tesla C2075 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU vs Tesla C2075 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU vs Tesla C2075: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU
2018Why buy it
- ✅Draws 7W instead of 247W, a 240W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Unknown architecture on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2018 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Tesla C2075
2011Why buy it
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Tesla C2075 is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌2011 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌3428.6% higher power demand at 247W vs 7W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU vs Tesla C2075 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU
The Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU is manufactured by Qualcomm. It was released in December 6 2018. The thermal design power (TDP) is 7W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,035 points.
Tesla C2075
The Tesla C2075 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 247W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,017 points.
Graphics Performance
The Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU scores 3,035 and the Tesla C2075 reaches 3,017 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance.
| Feature | Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU | Tesla C2075 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,035 | 3,017 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 40 nm |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU | Tesla C2075 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Tesla C2075 carries 2 GB. Tesla C2075 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU and 64-bit on the Tesla C2075.
| Feature | Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU | Tesla C2075 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU) vs 12 (11_0) (Tesla C2075). OpenGL: ES 3.2 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 1.
| Feature | Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU | Tesla C2075 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | ES 3.2 | 4.6+44% |
| Max Displays | 3+200% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Supported codecs: AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 (Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Tesla C2075).
| Feature | Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU | Tesla C2075 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VPU | — |
| Decoder | VPU | — |
| Codecs | AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU draws 7W versus the Tesla C2075's 247W — a 189% difference. The Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU) vs 350W (Tesla C2075). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU | Tesla C2075 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 7W-97% | 247W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 433.6+3454% | 12.2 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU came in at $0, while the Tesla C2075 launched at $0. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU) vs Infinity (Tesla C2075) — the Tesla C2075 offers NaN% better value. The newer card here is Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU (2018 vs 2011).
| Feature | Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU | Tesla C2075 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | $0 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | Infinity |
| Codename | — | GF110 |
| Release | December 6 2018 | July 25 2011 |
| Ranking | #916 | #553 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU and Tesla C2075
