G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS vs Radeon Pro WX 4170 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS vs Radeon Pro WX 4170: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS

2024

Why buy it

✅Radeon Pro WX 4170 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 20W instead of 50W, a 30W reduction.
✅More future proof: Unknown architecture on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2024 hardware with Unknown of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 7.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $400 MSRP).

Radeon Pro WX 4170

2016

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($400 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).

Trade-offs

❌2016 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌150% higher power demand at 50W vs 20W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 4.5% in PassMark G3D (3,000 vs 2,870), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 4nm process instead of 14nm and a newer 2024 generation instead of 2016. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon Pro WX 4170 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon Pro WX 4170 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p headroom, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS has the stronger long-term case.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS vs Radeon Pro WX 4170 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS

The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS is manufactured by Qualcomm. It was released in September 3 2024. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 20W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,000 points.

Radeon Pro WX 4170

The Radeon Pro WX 4170 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 10 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1125 MHz to 1201 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,870 points. Launch price was $399.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS scores 3,000 and the Radeon Pro WX 4170 reaches 2,870 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. Shader units: 768 (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS) vs 1,024 (Radeon Pro WX 4170).

Feature	Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS	Radeon Pro WX 4170
G3D Mark Score	3,000+5%	2,870
Process Node	4 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	768	1024+33%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS	Radeon Pro WX 4170
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 4170 carries 4 GB. Radeon Pro WX 4170 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS and 64-bit on the Radeon Pro WX 4170.

Feature	Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS	Radeon Pro WX 4170
VRAM Capacity	Shared System RAM	4 GB
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR5
Bus Width	System	64-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 4170). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: ES 3.2 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

Feature	Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS	Radeon Pro WX 4170
DirectX	12	12 (12_0)
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	ES 3.2	4.6+44%
Max Displays	3	4+33%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Adreno VPU (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS) vs VCE 3.4 (Polaris) (Radeon Pro WX 4170). Decoder: Adreno VPU vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (HEVC),AV1,VP9 (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only),AV1 (Decode Only) (Radeon Pro WX 4170).

Feature	Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS	Radeon Pro WX 4170
Encoder	Adreno VPU	VCE 3.4 (Polaris)
Decoder	Adreno VPU	UVD 6.3
Codecs	H.264,H.265 (HEVC),AV1,VP9	H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only),AV1 (Decode Only)

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS draws 20W versus the Radeon Pro WX 4170's 50W — a 85.7% difference. The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 4170). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 80°C.

Feature	Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS	Radeon Pro WX 4170
TDP	20W-60%	50W
Recommended PSU	1W-100%	350W
Power Connector	Integrated	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	—
Height	0mm	—
Slots	0	0
Temp (Load)	75-6%	80°C
Perf/Watt	150.0+161%	57.4

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS came in at $0, while the Radeon Pro WX 4170 launched at $400. On MSRP, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS was 100+% cheaper ($400 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS) vs 7.2 (Radeon Pro WX 4170) — the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS (2024 vs 2016).

Feature	Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS	Radeon Pro WX 4170
MSRP	$0-100%	$400
Performance per Dollar	Infinity	7.2
Codename	—	Baffin
Release	September 3 2024	November 10 2016
Ranking	#636	#526

Search Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS on Amazon

Search Radeon Pro WX 4170 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.