Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS vs Radeon R9 260

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS vs Radeon R9 260 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS vs Radeon R9 260: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS

2024

Why buy it

✅Radeon R9 260 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 20W instead of 275W, a 255W reduction.
✅More future proof: Unknown architecture on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2024 hardware with Unknown of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 21.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $139 MSRP).

Radeon R9 260

2013

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($139 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌1275% higher power demand at 275W vs 20W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R9 260 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.6% in PassMark G3D (3,048 vs 3,000), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 4nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2024 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R9 260 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R9 260 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p headroom, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS has the stronger long-term case.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS vs Radeon R9 260 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS

The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS is manufactured by Qualcomm. It was released in September 3 2024. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 20W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,000 points.

Radeon R9 260

The Radeon R9 260 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 5 2013. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 947 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,048 points. Launch price was $399.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS scores 3,000 and the Radeon R9 260 reaches 3,048 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. Shader units: 768 (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS) vs 2,560 (Radeon R9 260).

Feature	Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS	Radeon R9 260
G3D Mark Score	3,000	3,048+2%
Process Node	4 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	768	2560+233%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS	Radeon R9 260
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 260 carries 2 GB. Radeon R9 260 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 260.

Feature	Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS	Radeon R9 260
VRAM Capacity	Shared System RAM	2 GB
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	System	128-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS draws 20W versus the Radeon R9 260's 275W — a 172.9% difference. The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS) vs 450W (Radeon R9 260). Power connectors: Integrated vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS	Radeon R9 260
TDP	20W-93%	275W
Recommended PSU	1W-100%	450W
Power Connector	Integrated	1x 6-pin
Length	0mm	—
Height	0mm	—
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	75	—
Perf/Watt	150.0+1251%	11.1

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS came in at $0, while the Radeon R9 260 launched at $139. On MSRP, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS was 100+% cheaper ($139 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS) vs 21.9 (Radeon R9 260) — the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS (2024 vs 2013).

Feature	Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS	Radeon R9 260
MSRP	$0-100%	$139
Performance per Dollar	Infinity	21.9
Codename	—	Hawaii
Release	September 3 2024	November 5 2013
Ranking	#636	#316

Search Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS on Amazon

Search Radeon R9 260 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.