
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS

Tesla C2075
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS vs Tesla C2075 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS vs Tesla C2075 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS vs Tesla C2075: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS
2024Why buy it
- ✅Tesla C2075 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 20W instead of 247W, a 227W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Unknown architecture on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2024 hardware with Unknown of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
Tesla C2075
2011Why buy it
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
Trade-offs
- ❌2011 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌1135% higher power demand at 247W vs 20W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS vs Tesla C2075 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS
The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS is manufactured by Qualcomm. It was released in September 3 2024. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 20W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,000 points.

Tesla C2075
The Tesla C2075 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 247W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,017 points.
Graphics Performance
The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS scores 3,000 and the Tesla C2075 reaches 3,017 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. Shader units: 768 (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS) vs 448 (Tesla C2075).
| Feature | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS | Tesla C2075 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,000 | 3,017 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 768+71% | 448 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS | Tesla C2075 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Tesla C2075 carries 2 GB. Tesla C2075 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS and 64-bit on the Tesla C2075.
| Feature | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS | Tesla C2075 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS) vs 12 (11_0) (Tesla C2075). OpenGL: ES 3.2 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 1.
| Feature | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS | Tesla C2075 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | ES 3.2 | 4.6+44% |
| Max Displays | 3+200% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (HEVC),AV1,VP9 (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Tesla C2075).
| Feature | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS | Tesla C2075 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Adreno VPU | — |
| Decoder | Adreno VPU | — |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 (HEVC),AV1,VP9 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS draws 20W versus the Tesla C2075's 247W — a 170% difference. The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS) vs 350W (Tesla C2075). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 85°C.
| Feature | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS | Tesla C2075 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 20W-92% | 247W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 150.0+1130% | 12.2 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS came in at $0, while the Tesla C2075 launched at $0. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS) vs Infinity (Tesla C2075) — the Tesla C2075 offers NaN% better value. The newer card here is Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS (2024 vs 2011).
| Feature | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS | Tesla C2075 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | $0 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | Infinity |
| Codename | — | GF110 |
| Release | September 3 2024 | July 25 2011 |
| Ranking | #636 | #553 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














