Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS vs Tesla C2075

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS

2024
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Tesla C2075

2011Core: 574 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS vs Tesla C2075 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS vs Tesla C2075: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS

2024

Why buy it

  • Tesla C2075 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 20W instead of 247W, a 227W reduction.
  • More future proof: Unknown architecture on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2024 hardware with Unknown of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Tesla C2075

2011

Why buy it

  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).

Trade-offs

  • 2011 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 1135% higher power demand at 247W vs 20W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Tesla C2075 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.6% in PassMark G3D (3,017 vs 3,000), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 4nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2024 generation instead of 2011. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Tesla C2075 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Tesla C2075 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p headroom, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS has the stronger long-term case.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS vs Tesla C2075 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS

The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS is manufactured by Qualcomm. It was released in September 3 2024. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 20W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,000 points.

NVIDIA

Tesla C2075

The Tesla C2075 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 247W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,017 points.

Graphics Performance

The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS scores 3,000 and the Tesla C2075 reaches 3,017 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. Shader units: 768 (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS) vs 448 (Tesla C2075).

FeatureQualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPSTesla C2075
G3D Mark Score
3,000
3,017
Process Node
4 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
768+71%
448

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPSTesla C2075
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Tesla C2075 carries 2 GB. Tesla C2075 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS and 64-bit on the Tesla C2075.

FeatureQualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPSTesla C2075
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
2 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Bus Width
System
64-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS) vs 12 (11_0) (Tesla C2075). OpenGL: ES 3.2 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 1.

FeatureQualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPSTesla C2075
DirectX
12
12 (11_0)
OpenGL
ES 3.2
4.6+44%
Max Displays
3+200%
1
🎬

Media & Encoding

Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (HEVC),AV1,VP9 (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Tesla C2075).

FeatureQualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPSTesla C2075
Encoder
Adreno VPU
Decoder
Adreno VPU
Codecs
H.264,H.265 (HEVC),AV1,VP9
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS draws 20W versus the Tesla C2075's 247W — a 170% difference. The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS) vs 350W (Tesla C2075). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 85°C.

FeatureQualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPSTesla C2075
TDP
20W-92%
247W
Recommended PSU
1W-100%
350W
Power Connector
Integrated
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
75-12%
85°C
Perf/Watt
150.0+1130%
12.2
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS came in at $0, while the Tesla C2075 launched at $0. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS) vs Infinity (Tesla C2075) — the Tesla C2075 offers NaN% better value. The newer card here is Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS (2024 vs 2011).

FeatureQualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPSTesla C2075
MSRP
$0
$0
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
Infinity
Codename
GF110
Release
September 3 2024
July 25 2011
Ranking
#636
#553

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.