G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS vs Radeon R7 260 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS vs Radeon R7 260: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS

2024

Why buy it

✅Radeon R7 260 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 20W instead of 95W, a 75W reduction.
✅More future proof: Unknown architecture on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2024 hardware with Unknown of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 26.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $109 MSRP).

Radeon R7 260

2013

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 26.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($109 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs Unknown).

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌375% higher power demand at 95W vs 20W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 3.7% in PassMark G3D (3,000 vs 2,892), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 4nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2024 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R7 260 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R7 260 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p headroom, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS has the stronger long-term case.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS vs Radeon R7 260 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS

The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS is manufactured by Qualcomm. It was released in September 3 2024. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 20W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,000 points.

Radeon R7 260

The Radeon R7 260 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 17 2013. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1100 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 95W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,892 points. Launch price was $109.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS scores 3,000 and the Radeon R7 260 reaches 2,892 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. Shader units: 768 (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS) vs 768 (Radeon R7 260).

Feature	Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS	Radeon R7 260
G3D Mark Score	3,000+4%	2,892
Process Node	4 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	768	768

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS	Radeon R7 260
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 260 carries 1 GB. Radeon R7 260 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 260.

Feature	Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS	Radeon R7 260
VRAM Capacity	Shared System RAM	1 GB
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	96 GB/s
Bus Width	System	128-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon R7 260). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: ES 3.2 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.

Feature	Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS	Radeon R7 260
DirectX	12	12 (12_0)
Vulkan	1.3+8%	1.2
OpenGL	ES 3.2	4.6+44%
Max Displays	3	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Adreno VPU (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R7 260). Decoder: Adreno VPU vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (HEVC),AV1,VP9 (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MVC (Radeon R7 260).

Feature	Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS	Radeon R7 260
Encoder	Adreno VPU	VCE 2.0
Decoder	Adreno VPU	UVD 4.2
Codecs	H.264,H.265 (HEVC),AV1,VP9	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS draws 20W versus the Radeon R7 260's 95W — a 130.4% difference. The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS) vs 400W (Radeon R7 260). Power connectors: Integrated vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 170mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 80.

Feature	Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS	Radeon R7 260
TDP	20W-79%	95W
Recommended PSU	1W-100%	400W
Power Connector	Integrated	1x 6-pin
Length	0mm	170mm
Height	0mm	112mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	75-6%	80
Perf/Watt	150.0+393%	30.4

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS came in at $0, while the Radeon R7 260 launched at $109. On MSRP, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS was 100+% cheaper ($109 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS) vs 26.5 (Radeon R7 260) — the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS (2024 vs 2013).

Feature	Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS	Radeon R7 260
MSRP	$0-100%	$109
Performance per Dollar	Infinity	26.5
Codename	—	Bonaire
Release	September 3 2024	December 17 2013
Ranking	#636	#591

Search Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS on Amazon

Search Radeon R7 260 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.