Radeon 520 vs Radeon R7 A10-8750

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon 520 vs Radeon R7 A10-8750 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon 520 vs Radeon R7 A10-8750: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon 520

2017

Why buy it

✅12.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $172 less on MSRP ($78 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
✅Delivers 227.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.2 vs 3.4 G3D/$ ($78 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon R7 A10-8750

2016

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon 520 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
220.5% HIGHER MSRP
$250 MSRPvs$78 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.4 vs 11.2 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs $78 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon 520 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 12.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.1% in PassMark G3D (874 vs 856), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon 520 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 14nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2017 generation instead of 2016. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon 520 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $172 cheaper on MSRP at $78 vs $250, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 227.3% (11.2 vs 3.4), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Radeon 520 vs Radeon R7 A10-8750 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon 520

The Radeon 520 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 874 points. Launch price was $79.

Radeon R7 A10-8750

The Radeon R7 A10-8750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 6 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 856 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon 520 scores 874 and the Radeon R7 A10-8750 reaches 856 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 520 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon R7 A10-8750 uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon 520) vs 512 (Radeon R7 A10-8750). Raw compute: 1.211 TFLOPS (Radeon 520) vs 0.8192 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A10-8750).

Feature	Radeon 520	Radeon R7 A10-8750
G3D Mark Score	874+2%	856
Architecture	GCN 4.0	GCN 1.0
Process Node	14 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	512	512
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.211 TFLOPS+48%	0.8192 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	32	32
L1 Cache	128 KB	128 KB
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon 520	Radeon R7 A10-8750
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Radeon 520 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 A10-8750.

Feature	Radeon 520	Radeon R7 A10-8750
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon 520 draws 50W versus the Radeon R7 A10-8750's 55W — a 9.5% difference. The Radeon 520 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 250W (Radeon 520) vs 350W (Radeon R7 A10-8750). Power connectors: None vs None.

Feature	Radeon 520	Radeon R7 A10-8750
TDP	50W-9%	55W
Recommended PSU	250W-29%	350W
Power Connector	None	None
Perf/Watt	17.5+12%	15.6

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon 520 came in at $78, while the Radeon R7 A10-8750 launched at $250. On MSRP, Radeon 520 was 68.8% cheaper ($172 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 11.2 (Radeon 520) vs 3.4 (Radeon R7 A10-8750) — the Radeon 520 offers 229.4% better value. The newer card here is Radeon 520 (2017 vs 2016).

Feature	Radeon 520	Radeon R7 A10-8750
MSRP	$78-69%	$250
Performance per Dollar	11.2+229%	3.4
Codename	Lexa	Cape Verde
Release	April 20 2017	July 6 2016
Ranking	#668	#667

Search Radeon 520 on Amazon

Search Radeon R7 A10-8750 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.