
Radeon 535 vs GeForce 920MX

Radeon 535
Popular choices:

GeForce 920MX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon 535 is positioned at rank 119 and the GeForce 920MX is on rank 360, so the Radeon 535 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 535
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 920MX
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 920MX is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon 535.
| Insight | Radeon 535 | GeForce 920MX |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 920MX offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 920MX holds the technical lead. Priced at $54 (vs $100), it costs 46% less, resulting in a 87.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon 535 | GeForce 920MX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+87.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($100) | ✅More affordable ($54) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 535 and GeForce 920MX

Radeon 535
The Radeon 535 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,049 points. Launch price was $79.

GeForce 920MX
The GeForce 920MX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 25 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 965 MHz to 993 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 16W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,064 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon 535 scores 1,049 and the GeForce 920MX reaches 1,064 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 535 is built on GCN 4.0 while the GeForce 920MX uses Maxwell, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon 535) vs 256 (GeForce 920MX). Raw compute: 1.211 TFLOPS (Radeon 535) vs 0.5084 TFLOPS (GeForce 920MX). Boost clocks: 1183 MHz vs 993 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon 535 | GeForce 920MX |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,049 | 1,064+1% |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 512+100% | 256 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.211 TFLOPS+138% | 0.5084 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1183 MHz+19% | 993 MHz |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 32+33% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon 535 | GeForce 920MX |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Radeon 535) vs 1 MB (GeForce 920MX) — the GeForce 920MX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon 535 | GeForce 920MX |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 535 draws 50W versus the GeForce 920MX's 16W — a 103% difference. The GeForce 920MX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Radeon 535) vs 350W (GeForce 920MX). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon 535 | GeForce 920MX |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 16W-68% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 21.0 | 66.5+217% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 535 launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $100, while the GeForce 920MX launched at $100 and now averages $54. The GeForce 920MX costs 46% less ($46 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 10.5 (Radeon 535) vs 19.7 (GeForce 920MX) — the GeForce 920MX offers 87.6% better value. The Radeon 535 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2016).
| Feature | Radeon 535 | GeForce 920MX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100 | $100 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $100 | $54-46% |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.5 | 19.7+88% |
| Codename | Lexa | GM108 |
| Release | April 20 2017 | March 25 2016 |
| Ranking | #668 | #864 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















