
Radeon 610M vs Firepro W4190M

Radeon 610M
Popular choices:

Firepro W4190M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon 610M is positioned at rank 346 and the Firepro W4190M is on rank 45, so the Firepro W4190M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 610M
Performance Per Dollar Firepro W4190M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon 610M is significantly newer (2023 vs 2015). The Radeon 610M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Firepro W4190M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Firepro W4190M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon 610M.
| Insight | Radeon 610M | Firepro W4190M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (5nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Firepro W4190M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 610M and Firepro W4190M

Radeon 610M
The Radeon 610M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 128 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 2 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,157 points.
Firepro W4190M
The Firepro W4190M is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in November 12 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 825 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,168 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon 610M scores 1,157 and the Firepro W4190M reaches 1,168 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 610M is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Firepro W4190M uses GCN 1.0, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 128 (Radeon 610M) vs 384 (Firepro W4190M). Raw compute: 0.5632 TFLOPS (Radeon 610M) vs 0.6912 TFLOPS (Firepro W4190M). Boost clocks: 2200 MHz vs 900 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon 610M | Firepro W4190M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,157 | 1,168 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 128 | 384+200% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.5632 TFLOPS | 0.6912 TFLOPS+23% |
| Boost Clock | 2200 MHz+144% | 900 MHz |
| ROPs | 4 | 8+100% |
| TMUs | 8 | 24+200% |
| L1 Cache | 32 KB | 96 KB+200% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon 610M | Firepro W4190M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon 610M) vs 0.25 MB (Firepro W4190M) — the Radeon 610M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon 610M | Firepro W4190M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_2) (Radeon 610M) vs 12 (FL11_1) (Firepro W4190M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | Radeon 610M | Firepro W4190M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_2) | 12 (FL11_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon 610M) vs UVD4 (Firepro W4190M). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs VCE1. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Radeon 610M) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Firepro W4190M).
| Feature | Radeon 610M | Firepro W4190M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | UVD4 |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | VCE1 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 610M draws 15W versus the Firepro W4190M's 30W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon 610M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 610M) vs 350W (Firepro W4190M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon 610M | Firepro W4190M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-50% | 30W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 77.1+98% | 38.9 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















