Radeon 610M
VS
Firepro W4190M

Radeon 610M vs Firepro W4190M

AMD

Radeon 610M

2023Core: 400 MHzBoost: 2200 MHz
VS

Firepro W4190M

2015Core: 825 MHzBoost: 900 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon 610M is positioned at rank 346 and the Firepro W4190M is on rank 45, so the Firepro W4190M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon 610M

#336
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
938%
#338
851%
#339
848%
#343
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
771%
#344
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
766%
#346
Radeon 610M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#348
GeForce MX350
MSRP: $250|Avg: $200
98%
#349
GeForce 840A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
96%
#350
Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
MSRP: $450|Avg: $450
96%
#351
HD Graphics 630
MSRP: $100|Avg: $30
96%
#354
Radeon R7 M370
MSRP: $130|Avg: $40
94%
#357
Radeon 625
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
93%
#359
Radeon R7 M350
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
92%
#360
GeForce 920MX
MSRP: $100|Avg: $54
92%
#361
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Firepro W4190M

#23
Intel Arc Pro B60
MSRP: $500|Avg: $450
95%
#24
Radeon PRO W7600
MSRP: $599|Avg: $599
94%
#25
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
MSRP: $625|Avg: $750
94%
#26
Radeon Pro Vega 48
MSRP: $450|Avg: $450
86%
#30
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
506%
#45
Firepro W4190M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#48
Quadro K3100M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $400
98%
#50
Quadro K5000M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $509
96%
#51
Radeon PRO W6300
MSRP: $200|Avg: $150
95%
#52
Quadro K4100M
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $261
95%
#58
Quadro K2000M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30
86%
#60
Intel Arc Pro A60
MSRP: $380|Avg: $380
86%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon 610M is significantly newer (2023 vs 2015). The Radeon 610M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Firepro W4190M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Firepro W4190M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon 610M.

InsightRadeon 610MFirepro W4190M
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-1%)
Leading raw performance (+1%)
Longevity
RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (5nm)
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Firepro W4190M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 610M and Firepro W4190M

AMD

Radeon 610M

The Radeon 610M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 128 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 2 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,157 points.

Firepro W4190M

The Firepro W4190M is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in November 12 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 825 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,168 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon 610M scores 1,157 and the Firepro W4190M reaches 1,168 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 610M is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Firepro W4190M uses GCN 1.0, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 128 (Radeon 610M) vs 384 (Firepro W4190M). Raw compute: 0.5632 TFLOPS (Radeon 610M) vs 0.6912 TFLOPS (Firepro W4190M). Boost clocks: 2200 MHz vs 900 MHz.

FeatureRadeon 610MFirepro W4190M
G3D Mark Score
1,157
1,168
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
GCN 1.0
Process Node
5 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
128
384+200%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.5632 TFLOPS
0.6912 TFLOPS+23%
Boost Clock
2200 MHz+144%
900 MHz
ROPs
4
8+100%
TMUs
8
24+200%
L1 Cache
32 KB
96 KB+200%
L2 Cache
2 MB+700%
0.25 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon 610MFirepro W4190M
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon 610M) vs 0.25 MB (Firepro W4190M) — the Radeon 610M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon 610MFirepro W4190M
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Bus Width
System
64-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB+700%
0.25 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_2) (Radeon 610M) vs 12 (FL11_1) (Firepro W4190M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

FeatureRadeon 610MFirepro W4190M
DirectX
12 (12_2)
12 (FL11_1)
Vulkan
1.3+8%
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4+33%
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon 610M) vs UVD4 (Firepro W4190M). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs VCE1. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Radeon 610M) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Firepro W4190M).

FeatureRadeon 610MFirepro W4190M
Encoder
VCN 4.0
UVD4
Decoder
VCN 4.0
VCE1
Codecs
H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon 610M draws 15W versus the Firepro W4190M's 30W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon 610M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 610M) vs 350W (Firepro W4190M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon 610MFirepro W4190M
TDP
15W-50%
30W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
77.1+98%
38.9