
Radeon 610M vs GeForce 940M

Radeon 610M
Popular choices:

GeForce 940M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon 610M is positioned at rank #346 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 610M
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon 610M is significantly newer (2023 vs 2015). The Radeon 610M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce 940M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon 610M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce 940M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon 610M | GeForce 940M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.1%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (5nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon 610M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 610M and GeForce 940M

Radeon 610M
The Radeon 610M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 128 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 2 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,157 points.

GeForce 940M
The GeForce 940M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1072 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,133 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon 610M scores 1,157 and the GeForce 940M reaches 1,133 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 610M is built on RDNA 2.0 while the GeForce 940M uses Maxwell, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 128 (Radeon 610M) vs 384 (GeForce 940M). Raw compute: 0.5632 TFLOPS (Radeon 610M) vs 0.9032 TFLOPS (GeForce 940M). Boost clocks: 2200 MHz vs 1176 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon 610M | GeForce 940M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,157+2% | 1,133 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 128 | 384+200% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.5632 TFLOPS | 0.9032 TFLOPS+60% |
| Boost Clock | 2200 MHz+87% | 1176 MHz |
| ROPs | 4 | 8+100% |
| TMUs | 8 | 24+200% |
| L1 Cache | 32 KB | 192 KB+500% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon 610M | GeForce 940M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon 610M comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce 940M has 2 GB. The GeForce 940M offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon 610M) vs 1 MB (GeForce 940M) — the Radeon 610M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon 610M | GeForce 940M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 2 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | Unknown |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_2) (Radeon 610M) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce 940M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon 610M | GeForce 940M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_2) | 12 (11_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon 610M) vs NVENC (Maxwell) (GeForce 940M). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs PureVideo HD (VP6). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Radeon 610M) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce 940M).
| Feature | Radeon 610M | GeForce 940M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | NVENC (Maxwell) |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | PureVideo HD (VP6) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 610M draws 15W versus the GeForce 940M's 33W — a 75% difference. The Radeon 610M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 610M) vs 350W (GeForce 940M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.
| Feature | Radeon 610M | GeForce 940M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-55% | 33W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 77.1+125% | 34.3 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















