Radeon 610M
VS
GeForce GT 545

Radeon 610M vs GeForce GT 545

AMD

Radeon 610M

2023Core: 400 MHzBoost: 2200 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GT 545

2011Core: 720 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon 610M is positioned at rank 346 and the GeForce GT 545 is on rank 166, so the GeForce GT 545 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon 610M

#336
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
938%
#338
851%
#339
848%
#343
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
771%
#344
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
766%
#346
Radeon 610M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#348
GeForce MX350
MSRP: $250|Avg: $200
98%
#349
GeForce 840A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
96%
#350
Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
MSRP: $450|Avg: $450
96%
#351
HD Graphics 630
MSRP: $100|Avg: $30
96%
#354
Radeon R7 M370
MSRP: $130|Avg: $40
94%
#357
Radeon 625
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
93%
#359
Radeon R7 M350
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
92%
#360
GeForce 920MX
MSRP: $100|Avg: $54
92%
#361
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 545

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
970%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
932%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
921%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
919%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
917%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
912%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
901%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
897%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
889%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
887%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
876%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
874%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
858%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
858%
#90
GeForce RTX 5090 D v2
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $4086.44
99%
#91
Radeon Ryzen 5 150
MSRP: $350|Avg: $350
99%
#92
Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H
MSRP: $450|Avg: $450
96%
#93
Radeon Ryzen 5 5600U
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
93%
#150
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
1070%
#165
Radeon HD 8470D
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
100%
#166
GeForce GT 545
MSRP: $149|Avg: $20
100%
#169
GeForce GT 340
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
99%
#170
GeForce GT 230
MSRP: $44|Avg: $44
98%
#171
Radeon HD 6670
MSRP: $99|Avg: $99
98%
#174
Radeon R5 420
MSRP: $80|Avg: $20
96%
#175
Radeon R7 A8-7670K
MSRP: $118|Avg: $50
96%
#176
Radeon HD 6570
MSRP: $79|Avg: $79
94%
#177
Radeon HD 8370D
MSRP: $45|Avg: $10
94%
#180
Radeon HD 8310E
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon 610M is significantly newer (2023 vs 2011). The Radeon 610M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GT 545 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon 610M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GT 545.

InsightRadeon 610MGeForce GT 545
Performance
Leading raw performance (+3.8%)
Lower raw frame rates (-3.8%)
Longevity
RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (5nm)
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon 610M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 610M and GeForce GT 545

AMD

Radeon 610M

The Radeon 610M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 128 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 2 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,157 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 545

The GeForce GT 545 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 14 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 720 MHz. It has 144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,115 points. Launch price was $149.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon 610M scores 1,157 and the GeForce GT 545 reaches 1,115 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 610M is built on RDNA 2.0 while the GeForce GT 545 uses Fermi 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 128 (Radeon 610M) vs 144 (GeForce GT 545). Raw compute: 0.5632 TFLOPS (Radeon 610M) vs 0.4147 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 545).

FeatureRadeon 610MGeForce GT 545
G3D Mark Score
1,157+4%
1,115
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
Fermi 2.0
Process Node
5 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
128
144+13%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.5632 TFLOPS+36%
0.4147 TFLOPS
ROPs
4
16+300%
TMUs
8
24+200%
L1 Cache
32 KB
192 KB+500%
L2 Cache
2 MB+426%
0.38 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon 610MGeForce GT 545
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon 610M) vs 0.38 MB (GeForce GT 545) — the Radeon 610M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon 610MGeForce GT 545
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
System
Unknown
Bus Width
System
64-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB+426%
0.38 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_2) (Radeon 610M) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT 545). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

FeatureRadeon 610MGeForce GT 545
DirectX
12 (12_2)
12 (11_0)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4+33%
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon 610M) vs No NVENC (Fermi) (GeForce GT 545). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Radeon 610M) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GT 545).

FeatureRadeon 610MGeForce GT 545
Encoder
VCN 4.0
No NVENC (Fermi)
Decoder
VCN 4.0
PureVideo HD VP4
Codecs
H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon 610M draws 15W versus the GeForce GT 545's 70W — a 129.4% difference. The Radeon 610M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 610M) vs 300W (GeForce GT 545). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.

FeatureRadeon 610MGeForce GT 545
TDP
15W-79%
70W
Recommended PSU
350W
300W-14%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
None
Length
145mm
Height
111mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
85°C
Perf/Watt
77.1+385%
15.9
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon 610M is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2011).

FeatureRadeon 610MGeForce GT 545
MSRP
$149
Avg Price (30d)
$20
Codename
Dragon Range
GF116
Release
January 3 2023
May 14 2011
Ranking
#843
#849