Radeon 660M vs Tesla C2050

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon 660M vs Tesla C2050 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon 660M vs Tesla C2050: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon 660M

2023

Why buy it

✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 40W instead of 238W, a 198W reduction.
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).

Tesla C2050

2011

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2011 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌495% higher power demand at 238W vs 40W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon 660M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.4% in PassMark G3D (3,221 vs 3,176), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon 660M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 6nm process instead of 40nm, 6 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2011. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Tesla C2050 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Tesla C2050 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon 660M has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon 660M vs Tesla C2050 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon 660M

The Radeon 660M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1900 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,221 points.

Tesla C2050

The Tesla C2050 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 238W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,176 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon 660M scores 3,221 and the Tesla C2050 reaches 3,176 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 660M is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Tesla C2050 uses Fermi, both on 6 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (Radeon 660M) vs 448 (Tesla C2050). Raw compute: 1.459 TFLOPS (Radeon 660M) vs 1.028 TFLOPS (Tesla C2050).

Feature	Radeon 660M	Tesla C2050
G3D Mark Score	3,221+1%	3,176
Architecture	RDNA 2.0	Fermi
Process Node	6 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	384	448+17%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.459 TFLOPS+42%	1.028 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	48+200%
TMUs	24	56+133%
L1 Cache	128 KB	896 KB+600%
L2 Cache	2 MB+167%	0.75 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon 660M	Tesla C2050
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is System on the Radeon 660M and 64-bit on the Tesla C2050. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon 660M) vs 0.75 MB (Tesla C2050) — the Radeon 660M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon 660M	Tesla C2050
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR5
Bus Width	System	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+167%	0.75 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon 660M draws 40W versus the Tesla C2050's 238W — a 142.4% difference. The Radeon 660M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 660M) vs 350W (Tesla C2050). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Radeon 660M	Tesla C2050
TDP	40W-83%	238W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt	80.5+505%	13.3

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon 660M (2023 vs 2011).

Feature	Radeon 660M	Tesla C2050
MSRP	—	$2499
Codename	Rembrandt+	GF100
Release	January 3 2023	July 25 2011
Ranking	#565	#569

Search Radeon 660M on Amazon

Search Tesla C2050 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.