Radeon 660M vs Radeon R7 260X

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon 660M vs Radeon R7 260X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon 660M vs Radeon R7 260X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon 660M

2023

Why buy it

✅4.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 40W instead of 115W, a 75W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 23.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $139 MSRP).

Radeon R7 260X

2013

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 23.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($139 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon 660M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌187.5% higher power demand at 115W vs 40W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon 660M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 4.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.7% in PassMark G3D (3,221 vs 3,198), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon 660M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 6nm process instead of 28nm, 6 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2013. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R7 260X makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R7 260X is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon 660M has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon 660M vs Radeon R7 260X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon 660M

The Radeon 660M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1900 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,221 points.

Radeon R7 260X

The Radeon R7 260X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,198 points. Launch price was $139.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon 660M scores 3,221 and the Radeon R7 260X reaches 3,198 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 660M is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Radeon R7 260X uses GCN 2.0, both on 6 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (Radeon 660M) vs 896 (Radeon R7 260X). Raw compute: 1.459 TFLOPS (Radeon 660M) vs 1.971 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 260X). Boost clocks: 1900 MHz vs 1000 MHz.

Feature	Radeon 660M	Radeon R7 260X
G3D Mark Score	3,221	3,198
Architecture	RDNA 2.0	GCN 2.0
Process Node	6 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	896+133%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.459 TFLOPS	1.971 TFLOPS+35%
Boost Clock	1900 MHz+90%	1000 MHz
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	24	56+133%
L1 Cache	128 KB	224 KB+75%
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling + RSR	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon 660M	Radeon R7 260X
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is System on the Radeon 660M and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 260X. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon 660M) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon R7 260X) — the Radeon 660M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon 660M	Radeon R7 260X
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	System	104 GB/s
Bus Width	System	128-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon 660M draws 40W versus the Radeon R7 260X's 115W — a 96.8% difference. The Radeon 660M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 660M) vs 500W (Radeon R7 260X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	Radeon 660M	Radeon R7 260X
TDP	40W-65%	115W
Recommended PSU	350W-30%	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	—	170mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	—	2
Temp (Load)	—	80
Perf/Watt	80.5+190%	27.8

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon 660M (2023 vs 2013).

Feature	Radeon 660M	Radeon R7 260X
MSRP	—	$139
Codename	Rembrandt+	Bonaire
Release	January 3 2023	October 8 2013
Ranking	#565	#568

Search Radeon 660M on Amazon

Search Radeon R7 260X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.