P102-100 vs Radeon 660M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

P102-100

2018

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Poor future-proofing: 2018-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌525% higher power demand at 250W vs 40W.

Radeon 660M

2023

Why buy it

✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 40W instead of 250W, a 210W reduction.
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $600 MSRP).

P102-100

2018

Radeon 660M

2023

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Why buy it

✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 40W instead of 250W, a 210W reduction.
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Poor future-proofing: 2018-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌525% higher power demand at 250W vs 40W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $600 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is P102-100 better than Radeon 660M?

Yes. P102-100 is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 3,301 vs 3,221 in G3D Mark. On top of that, P102-100 is a 2018 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while Radeon 660M is a 2023 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon 660M is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2018, better upscaling support with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a 6nm process instead of 16nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

P102-100 can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $600 MSRP. P102-100 is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. P102-100 is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $600 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 2.5% higher G3D Mark. Radeon 660M is the newer 2023 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture, lower power draw (40W vs 250W), and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does Radeon 660M make more sense than P102-100?

Yes. Radeon 660M is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (40W vs 250W), future-proofing, and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of P102-100. The trade-off is that P102-100 currently gives you 2.5% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

P102-100 Benchmark Check

Radeon 660M Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	P102-100	Radeon 660M
1080p
low	142 FPS	36 FPS
medium	119 FPS	24 FPS
high	99 FPS	16 FPS
ultra	74 FPS	12 FPS
1440p
low	111 FPS	23 FPS
medium	89 FPS	14 FPS
high	74 FPS	8 FPS
ultra	56 FPS	6 FPS
4K
low	57 FPS	14 FPS
medium	50 FPS	9 FPS
high	41 FPS	6 FPS
ultra	37 FPS	4 FPS

Open P102-100 Open Radeon 660M

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	P102-100	Radeon 660M
1080p
low	149 FPS	145 FPS
medium	119 FPS	116 FPS
high	99 FPS	91 FPS
ultra	74 FPS	61 FPS
1440p
low	111 FPS	96 FPS
medium	89 FPS	71 FPS
high	74 FPS	54 FPS
ultra	56 FPS	40 FPS
4K
low	62 FPS	49 FPS
medium	50 FPS	37 FPS
high	47 FPS	29 FPS
ultra	37 FPS	20 FPS

Open P102-100 Open Radeon 660M

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	P102-100	Radeon 660M
1080p
low	149 FPS	145 FPS
medium	119 FPS	116 FPS
high	99 FPS	97 FPS
ultra	74 FPS	72 FPS
1440p
low	111 FPS	109 FPS
medium	89 FPS	87 FPS
high	74 FPS	72 FPS
ultra	56 FPS	54 FPS
4K
low	74 FPS	72 FPS
medium	59 FPS	58 FPS
high	50 FPS	48 FPS
ultra	37 FPS	36 FPS

Open P102-100 Open Radeon 660M

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	P102-100	Radeon 660M
1080p
low	149 FPS	145 FPS
medium	119 FPS	116 FPS
high	99 FPS	97 FPS
ultra	74 FPS	72 FPS
1440p
low	111 FPS	109 FPS
medium	89 FPS	87 FPS
high	74 FPS	72 FPS
ultra	56 FPS	54 FPS
4K
low	74 FPS	72 FPS
medium	59 FPS	58 FPS
high	50 FPS	48 FPS
ultra	37 FPS	36 FPS

Open P102-100 Open Radeon 660M

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of P102-100 and Radeon 660M

P102-100

The P102-100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 12 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1582 MHz to 1683 MHz. It has 3200 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,301 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon 660M

The Radeon 660M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1900 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,221 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The P102-100 scores 3,301 and the Radeon 660M reaches 3,221 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The P102-100 is built on Pascal while the Radeon 660M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 3,200 (P102-100) vs 384 (Radeon 660M). Raw compute: 10.77 TFLOPS (P102-100) vs 1.459 TFLOPS (Radeon 660M). Boost clocks: 1683 MHz vs 1900 MHz.

Feature	P102-100	Radeon 660M
G3D Mark Score	3,301+2%	3,221
Architecture	Pascal	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	16 nm	6 nm
Shading Units	3200+733%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	10.77 TFLOPS+638%	1.459 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1683 MHz	1900 MHz+13%
ROPs	80+400%	16
TMUs	200+733%	24
L1 Cache	1.2 MB+823%	0.13 MB
L2 Cache	2.5 MB+25%	2 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	P102-100	Radeon 660M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 2 GB of video memory. Bus width: 64-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 2.5 MB (P102-100) vs 2 MB (Radeon 660M) — the P102-100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	P102-100	Radeon 660M
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Bus Width	64-bit	System
L2 Cache	2.5 MB+25%	2 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The P102-100 draws 250W versus the Radeon 660M's 40W — a 144.8% difference. The Radeon 660M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (P102-100) vs 350W (Radeon 660M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.