GRID T4-1Q vs Radeon 660M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GRID T4-1Q

2015

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,880 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌462.5% higher power demand at 225W vs 40W.

Radeon 660M

2023

Why buy it

✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 40W instead of 225W, a 185W reduction.
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,880 MSRP).

GRID T4-1Q

2015

Radeon 660M

2023

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,880 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Why buy it

✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 40W instead of 225W, a 185W reduction.
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌462.5% higher power demand at 225W vs 40W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,880 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GRID T4-1Q better than Radeon 660M?

Yes. GRID T4-1Q is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 3,303 vs 3,221 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GRID T4-1Q is a 2015 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while Radeon 660M is a 2023 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon 660M is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2015, better upscaling support with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a 6nm process instead of 28nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GRID T4-1Q can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $1,880 MSRP. GRID T4-1Q is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. GRID T4-1Q is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $1,880 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 2.5% higher G3D Mark. Radeon 660M is the newer 2023 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture, lower power draw (40W vs 225W), and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does Radeon 660M make more sense than GRID T4-1Q?

Yes. Radeon 660M is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (40W vs 225W), future-proofing, and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of GRID T4-1Q. The trade-off is that GRID T4-1Q currently gives you 2.5% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GRID T4-1Q Benchmark Check

Radeon 660M Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GRID T4-1Q	Radeon 660M
1080p
low	103 FPS	36 FPS
medium	85 FPS	24 FPS
high	67 FPS	16 FPS
ultra	40 FPS	12 FPS
1440p
low	86 FPS	23 FPS
medium	72 FPS	14 FPS
high	51 FPS	8 FPS
ultra	29 FPS	6 FPS
4K
low	28 FPS	14 FPS
medium	26 FPS	9 FPS
high	17 FPS	6 FPS
ultra	15 FPS	4 FPS

Open GRID T4-1Q Open Radeon 660M

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GRID T4-1Q	Radeon 660M
1080p
low	128 FPS	145 FPS
medium	101 FPS	116 FPS
high	82 FPS	89 FPS
ultra	63 FPS	59 FPS
1440p
low	88 FPS	95 FPS
medium	65 FPS	71 FPS
high	53 FPS	55 FPS
ultra	40 FPS	40 FPS
4K
low	41 FPS	48 FPS
medium	32 FPS	37 FPS
high	29 FPS	30 FPS
ultra	24 FPS	20 FPS

Open GRID T4-1Q Open Radeon 660M

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GRID T4-1Q	Radeon 660M
1080p
low	149 FPS	145 FPS
medium	119 FPS	116 FPS
high	99 FPS	97 FPS
ultra	74 FPS	72 FPS
1440p
low	111 FPS	109 FPS
medium	89 FPS	87 FPS
high	74 FPS	72 FPS
ultra	56 FPS	54 FPS
4K
low	74 FPS	72 FPS
medium	59 FPS	58 FPS
high	50 FPS	48 FPS
ultra	37 FPS	36 FPS

Open GRID T4-1Q Open Radeon 660M

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GRID T4-1Q	Radeon 660M
1080p
low	149 FPS	145 FPS
medium	119 FPS	116 FPS
high	99 FPS	97 FPS
ultra	74 FPS	72 FPS
1440p
low	111 FPS	109 FPS
medium	89 FPS	87 FPS
high	74 FPS	72 FPS
ultra	56 FPS	54 FPS
4K
low	74 FPS	72 FPS
medium	59 FPS	58 FPS
high	49 FPS	48 FPS
ultra	36 FPS	36 FPS

Open GRID T4-1Q Open Radeon 660M

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GRID T4-1Q and Radeon 660M

GRID T4-1Q

The GRID T4-1Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,303 points.

Radeon 660M

The Radeon 660M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1900 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,221 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID T4-1Q scores 3,303 and the Radeon 660M reaches 3,221 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID T4-1Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon 660M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID T4-1Q) vs 384 (Radeon 660M). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID T4-1Q) vs 1.459 TFLOPS (Radeon 660M). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1900 MHz.

Feature	GRID T4-1Q	Radeon 660M
G3D Mark Score	3,303+3%	3,221
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	6 nm
Shading Units	2048+433%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.825 TFLOPS+231%	1.459 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1178 MHz	1900 MHz+61%
ROPs	64+300%	16
TMUs	128+433%	24
L1 Cache	768 KB+500%	128 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID T4-1Q	Radeon 660M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 2 GB of video memory. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.

Feature	GRID T4-1Q	Radeon 660M
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Bus Width	64-bit	System
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID T4-1Q draws 225W versus the Radeon 660M's 40W — a 139.6% difference. The Radeon 660M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID T4-1Q) vs 350W (Radeon 660M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.