GRID T4-1Q vs Radeon 660M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID T4-1Q vs Radeon 660M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GRID T4-1Q vs Radeon 660M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID T4-1Q

2015

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,880 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌462.5% higher power demand at 225W vs 40W.

Radeon 660M

2023

Why buy it

✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 40W instead of 225W, a 185W reduction.
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,880 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GRID T4-1Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.5% in PassMark G3D (3,303 vs 3,221), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon 660M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 6nm process instead of 28nm, 6 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2015. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GRID T4-1Q makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GRID T4-1Q is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon 660M has the stronger long-term case.

GRID T4-1Q vs Radeon 660M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID T4-1Q

The GRID T4-1Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,303 points.

Radeon 660M

The Radeon 660M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1900 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,221 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID T4-1Q scores 3,303 and the Radeon 660M reaches 3,221 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID T4-1Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon 660M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID T4-1Q) vs 384 (Radeon 660M). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID T4-1Q) vs 1.459 TFLOPS (Radeon 660M). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1900 MHz.

Feature	GRID T4-1Q	Radeon 660M
G3D Mark Score	3,303+3%	3,221
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	6 nm
Shading Units	2048+433%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.825 TFLOPS+231%	1.459 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1178 MHz	1900 MHz+61%
ROPs	64+300%	16
TMUs	128+433%	24
L1 Cache	768 KB+500%	128 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID T4-1Q	Radeon 660M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID T4-1Q and System on the Radeon 660M.

Feature	GRID T4-1Q	Radeon 660M
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Bus Width	64-bit	System
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID T4-1Q draws 225W versus the Radeon 660M's 40W — a 139.6% difference. The Radeon 660M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID T4-1Q) vs 350W (Radeon 660M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GRID T4-1Q	Radeon 660M
TDP	225W	40W-82%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	1mm	—
Slots	0	—
Perf/Watt	14.7	80.5+448%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon 660M (2023 vs 2015).

Feature	GRID T4-1Q	Radeon 660M
MSRP	$1880	—
Codename	GM204	Rembrandt+
Release	August 30 2015	January 3 2023
Ranking	#525	#565

Search GRID T4-1Q on Amazon

Search Radeon 660M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.