Radeon 660M vs P102-100
Radeon 660M
Popular choices:
P102-100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon 660M is positioned at rank 399 and the P102-100 is on rank 201, so the P102-100 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 660M
Performance Per Dollar P102-100
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The P102-100 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon 660M.
| Insight | Radeon 660M | P102-100 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.5%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (6nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the P102-100 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 660M and P102-100
Radeon 660M
The Radeon 660M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1900 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,221 points.
P102-100
The P102-100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 12 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1582 MHz to 1683 MHz. It has 3200 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,301 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon 660M scores 3,221 and the P102-100 reaches 3,301 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 660M is built on RDNA 2.0 while the P102-100 uses Pascal, both on 6 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 384 (Radeon 660M) vs 3,200 (P102-100). Raw compute: 1.459 TFLOPS (Radeon 660M) vs 10.77 TFLOPS (P102-100). Boost clocks: 1900 MHz vs 1683 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon 660M | P102-100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,221 | 3,301+2% |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 3200+733% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.459 TFLOPS | 10.77 TFLOPS+638% |
| Boost Clock | 1900 MHz+13% | 1683 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 80+400% |
| TMUs | 24 | 200+733% |
| L1 Cache | 0.13 MB | 1.2 MB+823% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2.5 MB+25% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon 660M | P102-100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon 660M) vs 2.5 MB (P102-100) — the P102-100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon 660M | P102-100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2.5 MB+25% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 660M draws 40W versus the P102-100's 250W — a 144.8% difference. The Radeon 660M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 660M) vs 350W (P102-100). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon 660M | P102-100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 40W-84% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 267mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 80.5+510% | 13.2 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 660M is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2018).
| Feature | Radeon 660M | P102-100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $600 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $80 |
| Codename | Rembrandt+ | GP102 |
| Release | January 3 2023 | February 12 2018 |
| Ranking | #565 | #560 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon 660M and P102-100
