
Radeon 740M vs GeForce GTX 560 Ti

Radeon 740M
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 560 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon 740M is positioned at rank #337 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 740M
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon 740M is significantly newer (2024 vs 2011). The Radeon 740M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 560 Ti lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 560 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon 740M.
| Insight | Radeon 740M | GeForce GTX 560 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.1%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) (4nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 560 Ti remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 740M and GeForce GTX 560 Ti

Radeon 740M
The Radeon 740M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2800 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 4 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,045 points.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti
The GeForce GTX 560 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 25 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 823 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,080 points. Launch price was $249.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon 740M scores 3,045 and the GeForce GTX 560 Ti reaches 3,080 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 740M is built on RDNA 3.0 while the GeForce GTX 560 Ti uses Fermi 2.0, both on 4 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 256 (Radeon 740M) vs 384 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti). Raw compute: 2.867 TFLOPS (Radeon 740M) vs 1.263 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 560 Ti).
| Feature | Radeon 740M | GeForce GTX 560 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,045 | 3,080+1% |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 256 | 384+50% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.867 TFLOPS+127% | 1.263 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 8 | 32+300% |
| TMUs | 16 | 64+300% |
| L1 Cache | 64 KB | 512 KB+700% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon 740M | GeForce GTX 560 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon 740M) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 560 Ti) — the Radeon 740M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon 740M | GeForce GTX 560 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | Unknown |
| Bus Width | System | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 740M draws 45W versus the GeForce GTX 560 Ti's 160W — a 112.2% difference. The Radeon 740M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 740M) vs 500W (GeForce GTX 560 Ti). Power connectors: None vs 2x 6-pin.
| Feature | Radeon 740M | GeForce GTX 560 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 45W-72% | 160W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | None | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 229mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 67.7+251% | 19.3 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 740M is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2011).
| Feature | Radeon 740M | GeForce GTX 560 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $249 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $50 |
| Codename | Phoenix2 | GF114 |
| Release | January 31 2024 | January 25 2011 |
| Ranking | #581 | #580 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















