
Radeon 780M
Popular choices:

Radeon RX Vega M GH
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon 780M
2024Why buy it
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 100W, a 85W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX Vega M GH across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Radeon RX Vega M GH
2018Why buy it
- ✅23.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2018-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌566.7% higher power demand at 100W vs 15W.
Radeon 780M
2024Radeon RX Vega M GH
2018Why buy it
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 100W, a 85W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅23.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX Vega M GH across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2018-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌566.7% higher power demand at 100W vs 15W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon 780M better than Radeon RX Vega M GH?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX Vega M GH still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon 780M | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 40 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 68 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 51 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 30 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 29 FPS | 26 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 14 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon 780M | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 96 FPS | 201 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 168 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 126 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 148 FPS |
| medium | 45 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 33 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 23 FPS | 69 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 35 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 25 FPS | 66 FPS |
| high | 20 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 13 FPS | 39 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon 780M | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 310 FPS | 295 FPS |
| medium | 249 FPS | 236 FPS |
| high | 206 FPS | 196 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 147 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 227 FPS | 221 FPS |
| medium | 186 FPS | 177 FPS |
| high | 155 FPS | 147 FPS |
| ultra | 117 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 147 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 73 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon 780M | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 173 FPS | 148 FPS |
| medium | 136 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 106 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 65 FPS | 65 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 71 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 50 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 29 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 780M and Radeon RX Vega M GH

Radeon 780M
Radeon 780M
The Radeon 780M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,906 points.

Radeon RX Vega M GH
Radeon RX Vega M GH
The Radeon RX Vega M GH is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 1 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1063 MHz to 1190 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,548 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon 780M scores 6,906 versus the Radeon RX Vega M GH's 6,548 — the Radeon 780M leads by 5.5%. The Radeon 780M is built on RDNA 3.0 while the Radeon RX Vega M GH uses GCN 4.0, both on 4 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 768 (Radeon 780M) vs 1,536 (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Raw compute: 8.909 TFLOPS (Radeon 780M) vs 3.656 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Boost clocks: 2900 MHz vs 1190 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon 780M | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,906+5% | 6,548 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 1536+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.909 TFLOPS+144% | 3.656 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2900 MHz+144% | 1190 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 48 | 96+100% |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB | 384 KB+50% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling + RSR | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon 780M | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon 780M comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX Vega M GH has 0 MB. The Radeon 780M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 1024-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon 780M) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX Vega M GH) — the Radeon 780M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon 780M | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | Shared | HBM2 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 204.8 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 1024-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon 780M) vs 12_1 (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | Radeon 780M | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12_1 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon 780M) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs UVD 6.3.
| Feature | Radeon 780M | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 780M draws 15W versus the Radeon RX Vega M GH's 100W — a 147.8% difference. The Radeon 780M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 780M) vs 1W (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Power connectors: None vs Integrated. Card length: 0mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Radeon 780M | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-85% | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | None | Integrated |
| Length | 0mm | 1mm |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 460.4+603% | 65.5 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 780M is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2018).
| Feature | Radeon 780M | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $0 |
| Codename | Phoenix | Polaris 22 |
| Release | January 31 2024 | February 1 2018 |
| Ranking | #359 | #373 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












