
Quadro P2000

Radeon 780M
Quadro P2000 vs Radeon 780M Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro P2000 vs Radeon 780M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro P2000 vs Radeon 780M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro P2000
2017Why buy it
- ✅14.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 16.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($425 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅25% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (5 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2017 hardware with 5 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌400% higher power demand at 75W vs 15W.
Radeon 780M
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 75W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro P2000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 5 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 16.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $425 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro P2000 vs Radeon 780M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro P2000
The Quadro P2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 6 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1076 MHz to 1480 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,964 points. Launch price was $585.

Radeon 780M
The Radeon 780M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,906 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P2000 scores 6,964 and the Radeon 780M reaches 6,906 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P2000 is built on Pascal while the Radeon 780M uses RDNA 3.0, both on 16 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Quadro P2000) vs 768 (Radeon 780M). Raw compute: 3.031 TFLOPS (Quadro P2000) vs 8.909 TFLOPS (Radeon 780M). Boost clocks: 1480 MHz vs 2900 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P2000 | Radeon 780M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,964 | 6,906 |
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024+33% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.031 TFLOPS | 8.909 TFLOPS+194% |
| Boost Clock | 1480 MHz | 2900 MHz+96% |
| ROPs | 40+25% | 32 |
| TMUs | 64+33% | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 384 KB+50% | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB | 2 MB+60% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P2000 | Radeon 780M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro P2000 has 5 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon 780M carries 4 GB. Quadro P2000 gives you 25% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro P2000 and System on the Radeon 780M. L2 Cache: 1.25 MB (Quadro P2000) vs 2 MB (Radeon 780M) — the Radeon 780M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro P2000 | Radeon 780M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 5 GB+25% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB | 2 MB+60% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Quadro P2000) vs 12.2 (Radeon 780M). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro P2000 | Radeon 780M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6.0 (Quadro P2000) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon 780M). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP8 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P2000) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon 780M).
| Feature | Quadro P2000 | Radeon 780M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6.0 | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP8 | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P2000 draws 75W versus the Radeon 780M's 15W — a 133.3% difference. The Radeon 780M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P2000) vs 350W (Radeon 780M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 201mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Quadro P2000 | Radeon 780M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 15W-80% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 201mm | 0mm |
| Height | 112mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Perf/Watt | 92.9 | 460.4+396% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Radeon 780M (2024 vs 2017).
| Feature | Quadro P2000 | Radeon 780M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $425 | — |
| Codename | GP106 | Phoenix |
| Release | February 6 2017 | January 31 2024 |
| Ranking | #346 | #359 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














