Quadro P2000 vs Radeon 780M

NVIDIA

Quadro P2000

2017Core: 1076 MHzBoost: 1480 MHz
Similar parts
···
VS
AMD

Radeon 780M

2024Core: 800 MHzBoost: 2900 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Quadro P2000 vs Radeon 780M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro P2000 vs Radeon 780M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro P2000 vs Radeon 780M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro P2000

2017

Why buy it

  • 14.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 16.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($425 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 25% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (5 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

  • 2017 hardware with 5 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 400% higher power demand at 75W vs 15W.

Radeon 780M

2024

Why buy it

  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 15W instead of 75W, a 60W reduction.
  • More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Quadro P2000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 5 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 16.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $425 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro P2000 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 14.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.8% in PassMark G3D (6,964 vs 6,906), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon 780M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 4nm process instead of 16nm, 12 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2024 generation instead of 2017. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro P2000 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro P2000 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon 780M has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro P2000 vs Radeon 780M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro P2000

The Quadro P2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 6 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1076 MHz to 1480 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,964 points. Launch price was $585.

AMD

Radeon 780M

The Radeon 780M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,906 points.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro P2000 scores 6,964 and the Radeon 780M reaches 6,906 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P2000 is built on Pascal while the Radeon 780M uses RDNA 3.0, both on 16 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Quadro P2000) vs 768 (Radeon 780M). Raw compute: 3.031 TFLOPS (Quadro P2000) vs 8.909 TFLOPS (Radeon 780M). Boost clocks: 1480 MHz vs 2900 MHz.

FeatureQuadro P2000Radeon 780M
G3D Mark Score
6,964
6,906
Architecture
Pascal
RDNA 3.0
Process Node
16 nm
4 nm
Shading Units
1024+33%
768
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.031 TFLOPS
8.909 TFLOPS+194%
Boost Clock
1480 MHz
2900 MHz+96%
ROPs
40+25%
32
TMUs
64+33%
48
L1 Cache
384 KB+50%
256 KB
L2 Cache
1.25 MB
2 MB+60%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro P2000Radeon 780M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro P2000 has 5 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon 780M carries 4 GB. Quadro P2000 gives you 25% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro P2000 and System on the Radeon 780M. L2 Cache: 1.25 MB (Quadro P2000) vs 2 MB (Radeon 780M) — the Radeon 780M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro P2000Radeon 780M
VRAM Capacity
5 GB+25%
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
Shared
Bus Width
256-bit
System
L2 Cache
1.25 MB
2 MB+60%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.0 (Quadro P2000) vs 12.2 (Radeon 780M). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureQuadro P2000Radeon 780M
DirectX
12.0
12.2+2%
Vulkan
1.1
1.3+18%
OpenGL
4.5
4.6+2%
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 6.0 (Quadro P2000) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon 780M). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP8 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P2000) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon 780M).

FeatureQuadro P2000Radeon 780M
Encoder
NVENC 6.0
VCN 4.0
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP8
VCN 4.0
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro P2000 draws 75W versus the Radeon 780M's 15W — a 133.3% difference. The Radeon 780M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P2000) vs 350W (Radeon 780M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 201mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.

FeatureQuadro P2000Radeon 780M
TDP
75W
15W-80%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
None
Length
201mm
0mm
Height
112mm
0mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Perf/Watt
92.9
460.4+396%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon 780M (2024 vs 2017).

FeatureQuadro P2000Radeon 780M
MSRP
$425
Codename
GP106
Phoenix
Release
February 6 2017
January 31 2024
Ranking
#346
#359

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.