Quadro P2000 vs Quadro T2000 Max-Q

NVIDIA

Quadro P2000

2017Core: 1076 MHzBoost: 1480 MHz
Similar parts
···
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro T2000 Max-Q

2019Core: 1200 MHzBoost: 1620 MHz
Similar parts
···

Quadro P2000 vs Quadro T2000 Max-Q Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro P2000 vs Quadro T2000 Max-Q FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro P2000 vs Quadro T2000 Max-Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro P2000

2017

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 16.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($425 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 25% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (5 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Quadro T2000 Max-Q across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2017 hardware with 5 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 87.5% higher power demand at 75W vs 40W.

Quadro T2000 Max-Q

2019

Why buy it

  • 11.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Quadro P2000 is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so Quadro T2000 Max-Q is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 40W instead of 75W, a 35W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 5 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 16.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $425 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro T2000 Max-Q is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 11.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro P2000 instead at 6,964 vs 6,959, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro T2000 Max-Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 12nm process instead of 16nm and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2017. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro P2000 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro P2000 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro T2000 Max-Q has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro P2000 vs Quadro T2000 Max-Q Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro P2000

The Quadro P2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 6 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1076 MHz to 1480 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,964 points. Launch price was $585.

NVIDIA

Quadro T2000 Max-Q

The Quadro T2000 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1620 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,959 points.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro P2000 scores 6,964 and the Quadro T2000 Max-Q reaches 6,959 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P2000 is built on Pascal while the Quadro T2000 Max-Q uses Turing, both on 16 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Quadro P2000) vs 1,024 (Quadro T2000 Max-Q). Raw compute: 3.031 TFLOPS (Quadro P2000) vs 3.318 TFLOPS (Quadro T2000 Max-Q). Boost clocks: 1480 MHz vs 1620 MHz.

FeatureQuadro P2000Quadro T2000 Max-Q
G3D Mark Score
6,964
6,959
Architecture
Pascal
Turing
Process Node
16 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
1024
1024
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.031 TFLOPS
3.318 TFLOPS+9%
Boost Clock
1480 MHz
1620 MHz+9%
ROPs
40+25%
32
TMUs
64
64
L1 Cache
0.38 MB
1 MB+163%
L2 Cache
1.25 MB+25%
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro P2000Quadro T2000 Max-Q
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro P2000 has 5 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro T2000 Max-Q carries 4 GB. Quadro P2000 gives you 25% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro P2000 and 256-bit on the Quadro T2000 Max-Q. L2 Cache: 1.25 MB (Quadro P2000) vs 1 MB (Quadro T2000 Max-Q) — the Quadro P2000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro P2000Quadro T2000 Max-Q
VRAM Capacity
5 GB+25%
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
256-bit
256-bit
L2 Cache
1.25 MB+25%
1 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.0 (Quadro P2000) vs 12.1 (Quadro T2000 Max-Q). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureQuadro P2000Quadro T2000 Max-Q
DirectX
12.0
12.1
Vulkan
1.1
1.3+18%
OpenGL
4.5
4.6+2%
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 6.0 (Quadro P2000) vs NVENC 7.0 (Quadro T2000 Max-Q). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP8 vs PureVideo HD VP9. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P2000) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro T2000 Max-Q).

FeatureQuadro P2000Quadro T2000 Max-Q
Encoder
NVENC 6.0
NVENC 7.0
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP8
PureVideo HD VP9
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro P2000 draws 75W versus the Quadro T2000 Max-Q's 40W — a 60.9% difference. The Quadro T2000 Max-Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P2000) vs 350W (Quadro T2000 Max-Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 201mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.

FeatureQuadro P2000Quadro T2000 Max-Q
TDP
75W
40W-47%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
201mm
0mm
Height
112mm
0mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Perf/Watt
92.9
174.0+87%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Quadro T2000 Max-Q (2019 vs 2017).

FeatureQuadro P2000Quadro T2000 Max-Q
MSRP
$425
Codename
GP106
TU117
Release
February 6 2017
May 27 2019
Ranking
#346
#357

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.