Quadro P2000
Radeon RX 570
Quadro P2000 vs Radeon RX 570 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro P2000 vs Radeon RX 570 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro P2000 vs Radeon RX 570: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro P2000
2017Why buy it
- ✅25% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (5 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 120W, a 45W reduction.
- ✅Measures 201mm instead of 241mm, a 40mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 570 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌2017 hardware with 5 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌151.5% HIGHER MSRP$425 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 16.4 vs 41.2 G3D/$ ($425 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
Radeon RX 570
2017Why buy it
- ✅18.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $256 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $425 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 151.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 41.2 vs 16.4 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $425 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Quadro P2000 is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so Radeon RX 570 is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 5 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2017 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌60% higher power demand at 120W vs 75W.
- ❌19.9% longer card at 241mm vs 201mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro P2000 vs Radeon RX 570 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Quadro P2000
The Quadro P2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 6 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1076 MHz to 1480 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,964 points. Launch price was $585.
Radeon RX 570
The Radeon RX 570 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1168 MHz to 1244 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,967 points. Launch price was $169.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P2000 scores 6,964 and the Radeon RX 570 reaches 6,967 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P2000 is built on Pascal while the Radeon RX 570 uses GCN 4.0, both on 16 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Quadro P2000) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 570). Raw compute: 3.031 TFLOPS (Quadro P2000) vs 5.095 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 570). Boost clocks: 1480 MHz vs 1244 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P2000 | Radeon RX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,964 | 6,967 |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 2048+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.031 TFLOPS | 5.095 TFLOPS+68% |
| Boost Clock | 1480 MHz+19% | 1244 MHz |
| ROPs | 40+25% | 32 |
| TMUs | 64 | 128+100% |
| L1 Cache | 384 KB | 512 KB+33% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB | 2 MB+60% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 570 is support for FSR Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Quadro P2000 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.
| Feature | Quadro P2000 | Radeon RX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro P2000 has 5 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 570 carries 4 GB. Quadro P2000 gives you 25% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro P2000 and 256-bit on the Radeon RX 570. L2 Cache: 1.25 MB (Quadro P2000) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 570) — the Radeon RX 570 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro P2000 | Radeon RX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 5 GB+25% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB | 2 MB+60% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Quadro P2000) vs 12 (Radeon RX 570). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 5.
| Feature | Quadro P2000 | Radeon RX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 5+25% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6.0 (Quadro P2000) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 570). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP8 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P2000) vs H.265,H.264 (Radeon RX 570).
| Feature | Quadro P2000 | Radeon RX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6.0 | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP8 | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | H.265,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P2000 draws 75W versus the Radeon RX 570's 120W — a 46.2% difference. The Quadro P2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P2000) vs 450W (Radeon RX 570). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 201mm vs 241mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Quadro P2000 | Radeon RX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-38% | 120W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 201mm | 241mm |
| Height | 112mm | 120mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 92.9+60% | 58.1 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Quadro P2000 came in at $425, while the Radeon RX 570 launched at $169. On MSRP, Radeon RX 570 was 60.2% cheaper ($256 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 16.4 (Quadro P2000) vs 41.2 (Radeon RX 570) — the Radeon RX 570 offers 151.2% better value.
| Feature | Quadro P2000 | Radeon RX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $425 | $169-60% |
| Performance per Dollar | 16.4 | 41.2+151% |
| Codename | GP106 | Polaris 20 |
| Release | February 6 2017 | April 18 2017 |
| Ranking | #346 | #356 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro P2000 and Radeon RX 570
