Quadro P2000 vs Radeon Pro 5300

CPU

GPU

Quadro P2000

2017Core: 1076 MHzBoost: 1480 MHz

Buy on Amazon

Radeon Pro 5300

2020Core: 1000 MHzBoost: 1650 MHz

Buy on Amazon

Quadro P2000 vs Radeon Pro 5300 Performance Spectrum

Quadro P2000

5 GB 75

6,964

0.0%

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

GeForce RTX 5060 Ti

Radeon Pro 5300

4 GB 85

7,125

+2.3%

Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870

Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro P2000 vs Radeon Pro 5300 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro P2000 vs Radeon Pro 5300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro P2000

2017

Why buy it

✅11.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅25% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (5 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

❌2017 hardware with 5 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌
41.7% HIGHER MSRP
$425 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 16.4 vs 23.8 G3D/$ ($425 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).

Radeon Pro 5300

2020

Why buy it

✅Costs $125 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $425 MSRP).
✅Delivers 44.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 23.8 vs 16.4 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $425 MSRP).
✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro P2000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 5 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro P2000 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 11.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon Pro 5300 instead at 7,125 vs 6,964, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon Pro 5300 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 7nm process instead of 16nm, and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2017. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon Pro 5300 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $125 cheaper on MSRP at $300 vs $425, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 44.9% (23.8 vs 16.4), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Quadro P2000 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Quadro P2000 vs Radeon Pro 5300 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro P2000

The Quadro P2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 6 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1076 MHz to 1480 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,964 points. Launch price was $585.

Radeon Pro 5300

The Radeon Pro 5300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,125 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro P2000 scores 6,964 and the Radeon Pro 5300 reaches 7,125 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P2000 is built on Pascal while the Radeon Pro 5300 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 16 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Quadro P2000) vs 1,280 (Radeon Pro 5300). Raw compute: 3.031 TFLOPS (Quadro P2000) vs 4.224 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5300). Boost clocks: 1480 MHz vs 1650 MHz.

Feature	Quadro P2000	Radeon Pro 5300
G3D Mark Score	6,964	7,125+2%
Architecture	Pascal	RDNA 1.0
Process Node	16 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	1024	1280+25%
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.031 TFLOPS	4.224 TFLOPS+39%
Boost Clock	1480 MHz	1650 MHz+11%
ROPs	40+25%	32
TMUs	64	80+25%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB	2 MB+60%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro P2000	Radeon Pro 5300
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro P2000 has 5 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 5300 carries 4 GB. Quadro P2000 gives you 25% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro P2000 and 128-bit on the Radeon Pro 5300. L2 Cache: 1.25 MB (Quadro P2000) vs 2 MB (Radeon Pro 5300) — the Radeon Pro 5300 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro P2000	Radeon Pro 5300
VRAM Capacity	5 GB+25%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	1.25 MB	2 MB+60%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.0 (Quadro P2000) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro 5300). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Quadro P2000	Radeon Pro 5300
DirectX	12.0	12.1
Vulkan	1.1	1.4+27%
OpenGL	4.5	4.6+2%
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 6.0 (Quadro P2000) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5300). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP8 vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P2000) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro 5300).

Feature	Quadro P2000	Radeon Pro 5300
Encoder	NVENC 6.0	VCN 2.0
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP8	VCN 2.0
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro P2000 draws 75W versus the Radeon Pro 5300's 85W — a 12.5% difference. The Quadro P2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P2000) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 5300). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 201mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.

Feature	Quadro P2000	Radeon Pro 5300
TDP	75W-12%	85W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	201mm	0mm
Height	112mm	0mm
Slots	1	0-100%
Perf/Watt	92.9+11%	83.8

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro P2000 came in at $425, while the Radeon Pro 5300 launched at $300. On MSRP, Radeon Pro 5300 was 29.4% cheaper ($125 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 16.4 (Quadro P2000) vs 23.8 (Radeon Pro 5300) — the Radeon Pro 5300 offers 45.1% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro 5300 (2020 vs 2017).

Feature	Quadro P2000	Radeon Pro 5300
MSRP	$425	$300-29%
Performance per Dollar	16.4	23.8+45%
Codename	GP106	Navi 14
Release	February 6 2017	August 4 2020
Ranking	#346	#351

Search Quadro P2000 on Amazon

Search Radeon Pro 5300 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.