
Quadro P2000
Popular choices:

FirePro W8100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro P2000 is positioned at rank 89 and the FirePro W8100 is on rank 254, so the Quadro P2000 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P2000
Performance Per Dollar FirePro W8100
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro P2000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro W8100 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro P2000 | FirePro W8100 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+60%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro P2000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro P2000 holds the technical lead. Priced at $190 (vs $200), it costs 5% less, resulting in a 7.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro P2000 | FirePro W8100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+7.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($190) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($200) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P2000 and FirePro W8100

Quadro P2000
The Quadro P2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 6 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1076 MHz to 1480 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,964 points. Launch price was $585.

FirePro W8100
The FirePro W8100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 23 2014. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 824 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,812 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P2000 scores 6,964 and the FirePro W8100 reaches 6,812 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P2000 is built on Pascal while the FirePro W8100 uses GCN 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Quadro P2000) vs 2,560 (FirePro W8100). Raw compute: 3.031 TFLOPS (Quadro P2000) vs 4.219 TFLOPS (FirePro W8100).
| Feature | Quadro P2000 | FirePro W8100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,964+2% | 6,812 |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 2.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 2560+150% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.031 TFLOPS | 4.219 TFLOPS+39% |
| ROPs | 40 | 64+60% |
| TMUs | 64 | 160+150% |
| L1 Cache | 384 KB | 640 KB+67% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB+25% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P2000 | FirePro W8100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro P2000 comes with 5 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro W8100 has 8 GB. The FirePro W8100 offers 60% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1.25 MB (Quadro P2000) vs 1 MB (FirePro W8100) — the Quadro P2000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro P2000 | FirePro W8100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 5 GB | 8 GB+60% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB+25% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Quadro P2000) vs 12 (FirePro W8100). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | Quadro P2000 | FirePro W8100 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.2+9% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6.0 (Quadro P2000) vs VCE 2.0 (FirePro W8100). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP8 vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P2000) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2,MVC (FirePro W8100).
| Feature | Quadro P2000 | FirePro W8100 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6.0 | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP8 | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2,MVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P2000 draws 75W versus the FirePro W8100's 220W — a 98.3% difference. The Quadro P2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P2000) vs 350W (FirePro W8100). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 201mm vs 241mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Quadro P2000 | FirePro W8100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-66% | 220W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 201mm | 241mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 87°C |
| Perf/Watt | 92.9+200% | 31.0 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P2000 launched at $425 MSRP and currently averages $190, while the FirePro W8100 launched at $2499 and now averages $200. The Quadro P2000 costs 5% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 36.7 (Quadro P2000) vs 34.1 (FirePro W8100) — the Quadro P2000 offers 7.6% better value. The Quadro P2000 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2014).
| Feature | Quadro P2000 | FirePro W8100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $425-83% | $2499 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $190-5% | $200 |
| Performance per Dollar | 36.7+8% | 34.1 |
| Codename | GP106 | Hawaii |
| Release | February 6 2017 | June 23 2014 |
| Ranking | #346 | #361 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















