Quadro P2000
VS
Tesla M60

Quadro P2000 vs Tesla M60

NVIDIA

Quadro P2000

2017Core: 1076 MHzBoost: 1480 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Tesla M60

2015Core: 557 MHzBoost: 1178 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro P2000 is positioned at rank 89 and the Tesla M60 is on rank 277, so the Quadro P2000 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro P2000

#49
RTX 2000E Ada Generation
MSRP: $999|Avg: $999
93%
#50
92%
#51
RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell
MSRP: $2399|Avg: $2015
90%
#52
RTX A1000
MSRP: $749|Avg: $500
88%
#54
Radeon Pro 5700
MSRP: $799|Avg: $250
88%
#55
Quadro P4000
MSRP: $815|Avg: $290
86%
#74
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
901%
#89
Quadro P2000
MSRP: $425|Avg: $190
100%
#90
Quadro T1000
MSRP: $400|Avg: $425
99%
#93
Radeon Pro 580
MSRP: $500|Avg: $150
95%
#94
T1000 8GB
MSRP: $500|Avg: $380
94%
#99
Quadro K620
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
90%
#100
Tesla K20Xm
MSRP: $7699|Avg: N/A
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Tesla M60

#109
Quadro M6000 24GB
MSRP: $4999|Avg: $600
100%
#110
Quadro GV100
MSRP: $8999|Avg: $8999
91%
#111
Tesla P40
MSRP: $5699|Avg: $150
89%
#112
GRID RTX6000-1Q
MSRP: $6299|Avg: $1500
86%
#261
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
6340%
#277
Tesla M60
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $250
100%
#278
FirePro V7900
MSRP: $999|Avg: $120
97%
#279
GRID M60-8A
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $120
95%
#280
GRID P6-4Q
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $150
95%
#282
Quadro K4000
MSRP: $1269|Avg: $100
92%
#285
GRID P4-2Q
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $235
91%
#286
Tesla C2070
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $38
89%
#287
Quadro 2000 D
MSRP: $599|Avg: $35
89%
#289
FirePro V5900
MSRP: $599|Avg: $15
88%
#290
FirePro S9000
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $156
87%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Tesla M60 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro P2000 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightQuadro P2000Tesla M60
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%)
Leading raw performance (+0.5%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+25%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
Standard Size (267mm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Quadro P2000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro P2000 holds the technical lead. Priced at $190 (vs $250), it costs 24% less, resulting in a 30.9% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightQuadro P2000Tesla M60
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+30.9%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($190)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($250)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P2000 and Tesla M60

NVIDIA

Quadro P2000

The Quadro P2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 6 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1076 MHz to 1480 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,964 points. Launch price was $585.

NVIDIA

Tesla M60

The Tesla M60 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,002 points.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro P2000 scores 6,964 and the Tesla M60 reaches 7,002 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P2000 is built on Pascal while the Tesla M60 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Quadro P2000) vs 2,048 (Tesla M60). Raw compute: 3.031 TFLOPS (Quadro P2000) vs 4.825 TFLOPS ×2 (Tesla M60). Boost clocks: 1480 MHz vs 1178 MHz.

FeatureQuadro P2000Tesla M60
G3D Mark Score
6,964
7,002
Architecture
Pascal
Maxwell 2.0
Process Node
16 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1024
2048 ×2+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.031 TFLOPS
4.825 TFLOPS ×2+59%
Boost Clock
1480 MHz+26%
1178 MHz
ROPs
40
64 ×2+60%
TMUs
64
128 ×2+100%
L1 Cache
384 KB
768 KB+100%
L2 Cache
1.25 MB
2 MB+60%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro P2000Tesla M60
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro P2000 comes with 5 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla M60 has 4 GB. The Quadro P2000 offers 25% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1.25 MB (Quadro P2000) vs 2 MB (Tesla M60) — the Tesla M60 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro P2000Tesla M60
VRAM Capacity
5 GB+25%
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
256-bit
256-bit
L2 Cache
1.25 MB
2 MB+60%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.0 (Quadro P2000) vs 12.1 (Tesla M60). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

FeatureQuadro P2000Tesla M60
DirectX
12.0
12.1
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
OpenGL
4.5
4.5
Max Displays
4
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 6.0 (Quadro P2000) vs NVENC 2.0 (2x) (Tesla M60). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP8 vs PureVideo HD VP6 (2x). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P2000) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (Tesla M60).

FeatureQuadro P2000Tesla M60
Encoder
NVENC 6.0
NVENC 2.0 (2x)
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP8
PureVideo HD VP6 (2x)
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
MPEG-2,H.264
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro P2000 draws 75W versus the Tesla M60's 300W — a 120% difference. The Quadro P2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P2000) vs 350W (Tesla M60). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 201mm vs 267mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots.

FeatureQuadro P2000Tesla M60
TDP
75W-75%
300W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
201mm
267mm
Height
112mm
111mm
Slots
1-50%
2
Perf/Watt
92.9+299%
23.3
💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro P2000 launched at $425 MSRP and currently averages $190, while the Tesla M60 launched at $3000 and now averages $250. The Quadro P2000 costs 24% less ($60 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 36.7 (Quadro P2000) vs 28.0 (Tesla M60) — the Quadro P2000 offers 31.1% better value. The Quadro P2000 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2015).

FeatureQuadro P2000Tesla M60
MSRP
$425-86%
$3000
Avg Price (30d)
$190-24%
$250
Performance per Dollar
36.7+31%
28.0
Codename
GP106
GM204
Release
February 6 2017
August 30 2015
Ranking
#346
#355