G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro P2000 vs Quadro T2000 (móvel) FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro P2000 vs Quadro T2000 (móvel): Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro P2000

2017

Why buy it

✅Costs $75 less on MSRP ($425 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
✅Delivers 17.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 16.4 vs 13.9 G3D/$ ($425 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
✅25% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (5 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro T2000 (móvel) across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2017 hardware with 5 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌25% higher power demand at 75W vs 60W.

Quadro T2000 (móvel)

2019

Why buy it

✅21.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Quadro P2000 is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so Quadro T2000 (móvel) is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 60W instead of 75W, a 15W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 5 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌
17.6% HIGHER MSRP
$500 MSRPvs$425 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 13.9 vs 16.4 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $425 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro T2000 (móvel) is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 21.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro P2000 instead at 6,964 vs 6,959, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro T2000 (móvel) is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 12nm process instead of 16nm and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2017. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro P2000 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $75 cheaper on MSRP at $425 vs $500, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 17.7% (16.4 vs 13.9), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro P2000 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro T2000 (móvel) has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro P2000 vs Quadro T2000 (móvel) Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro P2000

The Quadro P2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 6 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1076 MHz to 1480 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,964 points. Launch price was $585.

Quadro T2000 (móvel)

The Quadro T2000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1575 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 60W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,959 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro P2000 scores 6,964 and the Quadro T2000 (móvel) reaches 6,959 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P2000 is built on Pascal while the Quadro T2000 (móvel) uses Turing, both on 16 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Quadro P2000) vs 1,024 (Quadro T2000 (móvel)). Raw compute: 3.031 TFLOPS (Quadro P2000) vs 3.656 TFLOPS (Quadro T2000 (móvel)). Boost clocks: 1480 MHz vs 1785 MHz.

Feature	Quadro P2000	Quadro T2000 (móvel)
G3D Mark Score	6,964	6,959
Architecture	Pascal	Turing
Process Node	16 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	1024	1024
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.031 TFLOPS	3.656 TFLOPS+21%
Boost Clock	1480 MHz	1785 MHz+21%
ROPs	40+25%	32
TMUs	64	64
L1 Cache	0.38 MB	1 MB+163%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB+25%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro P2000	Quadro T2000 (móvel)
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro P2000 has 5 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro T2000 (móvel) carries 4 GB. Quadro P2000 gives you 25% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro P2000 and 256-bit on the Quadro T2000 (móvel). L2 Cache: 1.25 MB (Quadro P2000) vs 1 MB (Quadro T2000 (móvel)) — the Quadro P2000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro P2000	Quadro T2000 (móvel)
VRAM Capacity	5 GB+25%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit	256-bit
L2 Cache	1.25 MB+25%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.0 (Quadro P2000) vs 12.1 (Quadro T2000 (móvel)). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Quadro P2000	Quadro T2000 (móvel)
DirectX	12.0	12.1
Vulkan	1.1	1.3+18%
OpenGL	4.5	4.6+2%
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 6.0 (Quadro P2000) vs NVENC 7.0 (Quadro T2000 (móvel)). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP8 vs PureVideo HD VP9. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P2000) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro T2000 (móvel)).

Feature	Quadro P2000	Quadro T2000 (móvel)
Encoder	NVENC 6.0	NVENC 7.0
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP8	PureVideo HD VP9
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro P2000 draws 75W versus the Quadro T2000 (móvel)'s 60W — a 22.2% difference. The Quadro T2000 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P2000) vs 350W (Quadro T2000 (móvel)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 201mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.

Feature	Quadro P2000	Quadro T2000 (móvel)
TDP	75W	60W-20%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	201mm	0mm
Height	112mm	0mm
Slots	1	0-100%
Perf/Watt	92.9	116.0+25%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro P2000 came in at $425, while the Quadro T2000 (móvel) launched at $500. On MSRP, Quadro P2000 was 15% cheaper ($75 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 16.4 (Quadro P2000) vs 13.9 (Quadro T2000 (móvel)) — the Quadro P2000 offers 18% better value. The newer card here is Quadro T2000 (móvel) (2019 vs 2017).

Feature	Quadro P2000	Quadro T2000 (móvel)
MSRP	$425-15%	$500
Performance per Dollar	16.4+18%	13.9
Codename	GP106	TU117
Release	February 6 2017	May 27 2019
Ranking	#346	#319

Search Quadro P2000 on Amazon

Search Quadro T2000 (móvel) on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.