
Quadro P2000

Radeon RX 470 (móvel)
Quadro P2000 vs Radeon RX 470 (móvel) Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro P2000 vs Radeon RX 470 (móvel) FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro P2000 vs Radeon RX 470 (móvel): Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro P2000
2017Why buy it
- ✅25% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (5 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 16nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 470 (móvel) across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2017 hardware with 5 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌137.4% HIGHER MSRP$425 MSRPvs$179 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 16.4 vs 39.1 G3D/$ ($425 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
- ❌20000% longer card at 201mm vs 1mm.
Radeon RX 470 (móvel)
2016Why buy it
- ✅13.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $246 less on MSRP ($179 MSRP vs $425 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 138.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.1 vs 16.4 G3D/$ ($179 MSRP vs $425 MSRP).
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 201mm, a 200mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 5 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2016 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro P2000 vs Radeon RX 470 (móvel) Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro P2000
The Quadro P2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 6 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1076 MHz to 1480 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,964 points. Launch price was $585.

Radeon RX 470 (móvel)
The Radeon RX 470 (móvel) is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 926 MHz to 1074 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,000 points. Launch price was $549.99.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P2000 scores 6,964 and the Radeon RX 470 (móvel) reaches 7,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P2000 is built on Pascal while the Radeon RX 470 (móvel) uses GCN 4.0, both on 16 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Quadro P2000) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 470 (móvel)). Raw compute: 3.031 TFLOPS (Quadro P2000) vs 4.399 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 470 (móvel)). Boost clocks: 1480 MHz vs 1074 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P2000 | Radeon RX 470 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,964 | 7,000 |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 2048+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.031 TFLOPS | 4.399 TFLOPS+45% |
| Boost Clock | 1480 MHz+38% | 1074 MHz |
| ROPs | 40+25% | 32 |
| TMUs | 64 | 128+100% |
| L1 Cache | 384 KB | 512 KB+33% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB | 2 MB+60% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P2000 | Radeon RX 470 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro P2000 has 5 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 470 (móvel) carries 4 GB. Quadro P2000 gives you 25% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro P2000 and 256-bit on the Radeon RX 470 (móvel). L2 Cache: 1.25 MB (Quadro P2000) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 470 (móvel)) — the Radeon RX 470 (móvel) has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro P2000 | Radeon RX 470 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 5 GB+25% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB | 2 MB+60% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Quadro P2000) vs 12 (Radeon RX 470 (móvel)). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | Quadro P2000 | Radeon RX 470 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6.0 (Quadro P2000) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 470 (móvel)). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP8 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P2000) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 470 (móvel)).
| Feature | Quadro P2000 | Radeon RX 470 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6.0 | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP8 | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P2000 draws 75W versus the Radeon RX 470 (móvel)'s 85W — a 12.5% difference. The Quadro P2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P2000) vs 350W (Radeon RX 470 (móvel)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 201mm vs 1mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Quadro P2000 | Radeon RX 470 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-12% | 85W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 201mm | 1mm |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 92.9+13% | 82.4 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Quadro P2000 came in at $425, while the Radeon RX 470 (móvel) launched at $179. On MSRP, Radeon RX 470 (móvel) was 57.9% cheaper ($246 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 16.4 (Quadro P2000) vs 39.1 (Radeon RX 470 (móvel)) — the Radeon RX 470 (móvel) offers 138.4% better value. The newer card here is Quadro P2000 (2017 vs 2016).
| Feature | Quadro P2000 | Radeon RX 470 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $425 | $179-58% |
| Performance per Dollar | 16.4 | 39.1+138% |
| Codename | GP106 | Ellesmere |
| Release | February 6 2017 | August 4 2016 |
| Ranking | #346 | #360 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














