CPU
GPU
Quadro P2000
Popular choices:
Radeon RX 470 (móvel)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro P2000 is positioned at rank 89 and the Radeon RX 470 (móvel) is on rank 114, so the Quadro P2000 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P2000
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 470 (móvel)
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 470 (móvel) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro P2000 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro P2000 | Radeon RX 470 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+25%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 470 (móvel) offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon RX 470 (móvel) holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $190), it costs 79% less, resulting in a 377.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro P2000 | Radeon RX 470 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+377.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($190) | ✅More affordable ($40) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P2000 and Radeon RX 470 (móvel)
Quadro P2000
The Quadro P2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 6 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1076 MHz to 1480 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,964 points. Launch price was $585.
Radeon RX 470 (móvel)
The Radeon RX 470 (móvel) is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 926 MHz to 1074 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,000 points. Launch price was $549.99.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P2000 scores 6,964 and the Radeon RX 470 (móvel) reaches 7,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P2000 is built on Pascal while the Radeon RX 470 (móvel) uses GCN 4.0, both on 16 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Quadro P2000) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 470 (móvel)). Raw compute: 3.031 TFLOPS (Quadro P2000) vs 4.399 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 470 (móvel)). Boost clocks: 1480 MHz vs 1074 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P2000 | Radeon RX 470 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,964 | 7,000 |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 2048+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.031 TFLOPS | 4.399 TFLOPS+45% |
| Boost Clock | 1480 MHz+38% | 1074 MHz |
| ROPs | 40+25% | 32 |
| TMUs | 64 | 128+100% |
| L1 Cache | 384 KB | 512 KB+33% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB | 2 MB+60% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P2000 | Radeon RX 470 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro P2000 comes with 5 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 470 (móvel) has 4 GB. The Quadro P2000 offers 25% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1.25 MB (Quadro P2000) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 470 (móvel)) — the Radeon RX 470 (móvel) has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro P2000 | Radeon RX 470 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 5 GB+25% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB | 2 MB+60% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Quadro P2000) vs 12 (Radeon RX 470 (móvel)). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | Quadro P2000 | Radeon RX 470 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6.0 (Quadro P2000) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 470 (móvel)). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP8 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P2000) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 470 (móvel)).
| Feature | Quadro P2000 | Radeon RX 470 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6.0 | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP8 | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P2000 draws 75W versus the Radeon RX 470 (móvel)'s 85W — a 12.5% difference. The Quadro P2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P2000) vs 350W (Radeon RX 470 (móvel)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 201mm vs 1mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Quadro P2000 | Radeon RX 470 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-12% | 85W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 201mm | 1mm |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 92.9+13% | 82.4 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P2000 launched at $425 MSRP and currently averages $190, while the Radeon RX 470 (móvel) launched at $179 and now averages $40. The Radeon RX 470 (móvel) costs 78.9% less ($150 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 36.7 (Quadro P2000) vs 175.0 (Radeon RX 470 (móvel)) — the Radeon RX 470 (móvel) offers 376.8% better value. The Quadro P2000 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2016).
| Feature | Quadro P2000 | Radeon RX 470 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $425 | $179-58% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $190 | $40-79% |
| Performance per Dollar | 36.7 | 175.0+377% |
| Codename | GP106 | Ellesmere |
| Release | February 6 2017 | August 4 2016 |
| Ranking | #346 | #360 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro P2000 and Radeon RX 470 (móvel)
