CPU
GPU
Quadro P2000
Popular choices:
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro P2000 is positioned at rank 89 and the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS is on rank 197, so the Quadro P2000 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P2000
Performance Per Dollar Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS is significantly newer (2023 vs 2017). The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro P2000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro P2000 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro P2000 | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | Legacy (4nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro P2000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $190 versus $250 for the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS, it costs 24% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 30.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro P2000 | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+30.9%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($190) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($250) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P2000 and Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
Quadro P2000
The Quadro P2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 6 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1076 MHz to 1480 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,964 points. Launch price was $585.
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS is manufactured by Qualcomm. It was released in October 26 2023. The boost clock speed is 1500 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,000 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P2000 scores 6,964 and the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS reaches 7,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. Shader units: 1,024 (Quadro P2000) vs 1,536 (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS). Boost clocks: 1480 MHz vs 1500 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P2000 | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,964 | 7,000 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 1536+50% |
| Boost Clock | 1480 MHz | 1500 MHz+1% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P2000 | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro P2000 comes with 5 GB of VRAM, while the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS has 0 MB. The Quadro P2000 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Quadro P2000 | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 5 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Quadro P2000) vs 12.1 (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs ES 3.2. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | Quadro P2000 | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.5+41% | ES 3.2 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6.0 (Quadro P2000) vs Adreno VPU (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP8 vs Adreno VPU. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P2000) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS).
| Feature | Quadro P2000 | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6.0 | Adreno VPU |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP8 | Adreno VPU |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P2000 draws 75W versus the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS's 40W — a 60.9% difference. The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P2000) vs 1W (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Card length: 201mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Quadro P2000 | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 40W-47% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 201mm | 0mm |
| Height | 112mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Perf/Watt | 92.9 | 175.0+88% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P2000 launched at $425 MSRP and currently averages $190, while the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS launched at $250 and now averages $250. The Quadro P2000 costs 24% less ($60 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 36.7 (Quadro P2000) vs 28.0 (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS) — the Quadro P2000 offers 31.1% better value. The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2017).
| Feature | Quadro P2000 | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $425 | $250-41% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $190-24% | $250 |
| Performance per Dollar | 36.7+31% | 28.0 |
| Codename | GP106 | — |
| Release | February 6 2017 | October 26 2023 |
| Ranking | #346 | #482 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro P2000 and Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
