Quadro P2000
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
Quadro P2000 vs Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro P2000 vs Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Quadro P2000 vs Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro P2000
2017Why buy it
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (5 GB vs Unknown).
Trade-offs
- ❌2017 hardware with 5 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌70% HIGHER MSRP$425 MSRPvs$250 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 16.4 vs 28.0 G3D/$ ($425 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ❌87.5% higher power demand at 75W vs 40W.
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $175 less on MSRP ($250 MSRP vs $425 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 70.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 28.0 vs 16.4 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs $425 MSRP).
- ✅Quadro P2000 is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 40W instead of 75W, a 35W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 5 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Older hardware, Unknown of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro P2000 vs Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Quadro P2000
The Quadro P2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 6 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1076 MHz to 1480 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,964 points. Launch price was $585.
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS is manufactured by Qualcomm. It was released in October 26 2023. The boost clock speed is 1500 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,000 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P2000 scores 6,964 and the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS reaches 7,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. Shader units: 1,024 (Quadro P2000) vs 1,536 (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS). Boost clocks: 1480 MHz vs 1500 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P2000 | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,964 | 7,000 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 1536+50% |
| Boost Clock | 1480 MHz | 1500 MHz+1% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P2000 | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro P2000 has 5 GB of VRAM, while the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS carries 0 MB. Quadro P2000 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro P2000 and 128-bit on the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS.
| Feature | Quadro P2000 | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 5 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Quadro P2000) vs 12.1 (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs ES 3.2. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | Quadro P2000 | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.5+41% | ES 3.2 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6.0 (Quadro P2000) vs Adreno VPU (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP8 vs Adreno VPU. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P2000) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS).
| Feature | Quadro P2000 | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6.0 | Adreno VPU |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP8 | Adreno VPU |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P2000 draws 75W versus the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS's 40W — a 60.9% difference. The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P2000) vs 1W (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Card length: 201mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Quadro P2000 | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 40W-47% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 201mm | 0mm |
| Height | 112mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Perf/Watt | 92.9 | 175.0+88% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Quadro P2000 came in at $425, while the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS launched at $250. On MSRP, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS was 41.2% cheaper ($175 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 16.4 (Quadro P2000) vs 28.0 (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS) — the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS offers 70.7% better value. The newer card here is Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS (2023 vs 2017).
| Feature | Quadro P2000 | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $425 | $250-41% |
| Performance per Dollar | 16.4 | 28.0+71% |
| Codename | GP106 | — |
| Release | February 6 2017 | October 26 2023 |
| Ranking | #346 | #482 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro P2000 and Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
